Integrated Water Resources Strategy: Oregon IWRS

IWRS means Oregon’s statewide Integrated Water Resources Strategy. On November 12, 2024, six Oregon departments hosted a public meeting to discuss IWRS priorities for the next five to 7 years. Sponsoring departments included:

• Water Resources Department
• Department of Fish and Wildlife
• Department of Environmental Quality
• Department of Agriculture
• Watershed Enhancement Board
• Department of Land Conservation and Development

Over 50 people attended both online and in person in Salem, including Schroeder Law Offices, to learn what the agencies believed were the most important actions for the state to take related to water quality and quantity concerns.

What IWRS Is

The IWRS is a state-wide initiative for inter-agency communication to understand Oregon’s instream and out-of-stream water needs. Governor Kotek requested a pause on IWRS after the agencies issued the first draft of the priorities since many agencies were transitioning to new directors.

The IWRS has 47 required actions, and the agencies decided to break these actions down into three “buckets”. They are titled 1) Prevent Things from Getting Worse; 2) Optimize: Highest and Best Use; and 3) Help Communities Prepare and Adapt.

The first bucket concerns sustainable practices and limiting and reducing contamination of water resources. The second bucket concerns prioritizing innovative water solutions and data-driven projects for decision-making. The third bucket concerns informing the public of what the “water future” looks like, helping economies adapt to water changes, and increasing volunteer-based incentive programs for target priorities. The public had the opportunity to comment on the agencies’ priorities. They provided questions and feedback as well.

Commenters questioned the lack of enforcement language within the goals from the Department of Environmental Quality, such as in the Lower Umatilla Basin Groundwater Management Area. This area, referred to as the “LUBGWMA,” experiences challenges with nitrate levels in domestic wells that are not connected to a community or municipal system. Commenters also questioned the scale of the projects to ensure the projects could be feasibly implemented in all communities.

Next Draft Coming in January, 2025

The agencies will publish the next draft for the IWRS in January 2025 which will include these priority areas. The public can submit comments to the draft IWRS. If you have interest in these projects or concerns, be sure to submit comments to the agencies for their consideration. After public review and comment, the agencies will present the draft to the Water Resources Commission in March 2025 for a workshop discussion. The agencies expect to provide the Final Draft of the IWRS to Water Resources Commission in late Spring 2025, with a hope of official adoption in June 2025.

On September 17th, 2024, the Oregon Water Resources Department (OWRD) implemented new groundwater rules that have sparked significant debate. While these rules aim to promote sustainable water use, they also raise several concerns that merit discussion.

Arbitrary Power and Political Influence

One of the primary criticisms of the new groundwater rules is that they grant the OWRD considerable discretionary power. The department can now deny groundwater permits based on criteria that some argue are too subjective and potentially influenced by the political climate at the time of filing. This level of control could lead to inconsistent decision-making, where permit approvals or denials hinge more on the prevailing political winds than on objective, scientific assessments.

New Groundwater Rules: Development by Unelected Officials

Another contentious point is that these rules were developed by unelected officials. The process involved various advisory committees and consultations, but ultimately, the decision-making power rested with individuals who are not directly accountable to the public. This has led to concerns about transparency and the democratic legitimacy of the rule-making process.

Influence of Powerful Non-Profit Organizations

The involvement of powerful non-profit organizations in shaping the new groundwater rules has also been a point of contention. Groups such as the Oregon Environmental Council and WaterWatch of Oregon played significant roles in the advisory process. While these organizations advocate for important environmental causes, their influence raises questions about whose interests are being prioritized. Critics argue that the rules may reflect the agendas of these groups more than the needs of all Oregonians.

Balancing Conservation and Agriculture

Water conservation is undeniably crucial, especially in the face of climate change and increasing water scarcity. However, the new groundwater rules must also consider the needs of Oregon’s robust agriculture industry. Agriculture is a vital part of the state’s economy, and overly restrictive water regulations could harm farmers and ranchers who rely on groundwater for irrigation and livestock.

Conclusion

While the new groundwater rules aim to address critical issues of sustainability and resource management, they also present several challenges. The potential for arbitrary decision-making, the influence of unelected officials and powerful non-profits, and the impact on the agriculture industry are all significant concerns that need to be addressed. Moving forward, it is essential to find a balanced approach that ensures water conservation while respecting the diverse needs of all Oregonians.

At Schroeder Law Offices, P.C., we can assist you in navigating the new and evermore complicated water laws in Oregon. Please contact us at (503) 281-4100 if you have any questions. Or for more about water rights in Oregon see this article.

At Schroeder Law Offices we are dedicated to providing exceptional service to our clients. Leveraging advanced technology like TABS3, NetDocuments, Zoom, and Microsoft 365 helps us achieve this goal. They streamline our operations and enhance client satisfaction.

TABS3: Leveraging Technology in Practice Management

TABS3 is a comprehensive practice management software that benefits clients in several ways:

• Efficient Billing and Accounting: Automated billing cycles and detailed financial reports ensure transparency and accuracy. You always know where your case stands financially.
• Accurate Time Tracking: We meticulously track every billable hour, ensuring fair and accurate billing for the time dedicated to your case.
• Organized Case Management: TABS3 centralizes all case-related information, allowing us to manage your case files, deadlines, and communications efficiently.

NetDocuments: Leveraging Technology in Document Management

NetDocuments is our go-to solution for managing legal documents securely and efficiently:

• Secure Cloud Storage: Your documents are stored securely in the cloud, making them accessible from anywhere, which is valuable for remote consultations and collaboration.
• Robust Security and Compliance: NetDocuments protects your sensitive information with top-notch encryption and access controls, ensuring compliance with industry standards.
• Seamless Collaboration: Our team can collaborate on documents in real-time, leading to faster turnaround times and reduced risk of errors.
• Quick Document Retrieval: Advanced search capabilities allow us to locate your documents quickly, ensuring prompt responses to your needs.

Zoom: Leveraging Technology for Remote Consultations

Zoom enables us to connect with you no matter where you are:

• Virtual Meetings: We can hold virtual consultations, making it convenient for you to discuss your case without needing to travel.
• Secure Communication: Zoom provides secure, encrypted communication, ensuring your privacy during our meetings.
• Flexibility: Whether you’re at home or on the go, Zoom allows us to stay connected and keep you updated on your case.
• Integrated Phone, Meetings and Webinars: Zoom handles all our voice and video from internal and external phone calls to client meetings to webinars.

Microsoft 365: Leveraging Technology for Productivity and Collaboration

Microsoft 365 is an essential tool for our daily operations:

• Email Management: Outlook integrates seamlessly with NetDocuments so that we can manage our communications efficiently, ensuring timely responses and organized email history.
• Document Creation and Sharing: Tools like Word, Excel, and PowerPoint allow us to create, edit, and share documents.

Conclusion

At Schroeder Law Offices embracing technology is essential to delivering the best possible service to our clients. TABS3, NetDocuments, Zoom, and Microsoft 365 are just a few examples of how we leverage advanced tools to manage our practice more effectively. By using these technologies, we can focus on what we do best—advocating for you and achieving the best outcomes for your legal matters.

Thank you for trusting us with your legal needs. If you have any questions about how we use technology to your benefit please call or email.

The United States Committee for Irrigation and Drainage (USCID) fall conference registration is now open. www.uscid.org  As the current president of this organization, I’m letting my “friends of Schroeder Law Offices” know what we are up to when not working in the office representing our clients.

What is USCID?

The USCID is a non-profit organization dedicated to sharing and collaborating on all water issues. These especially relate to planning, design, construction, operation, and maintenance of irrigation, drainage and flow control works. They particularly include agricultural economics; water law; and environmental and social issues affecting irrigated agriculture.  As you might tell, given my upbringing in irrigated agriculture, these are all areas near and dear to me.  With all the challenges facing water use in the United States, this organization of scientists, engineers, extension representatives, irrigation managers, agency representatives, policy makers, and product engineers and manufactures, is the place to be when it comes to learning about cutting edge developments and studies in handing the ever-increasing water scarcity. 

At Schroeder Law Offices, we strive to understand water use in all facets from growing food and fiber and supplying safe water supplies for our clients. Participating in these organizations it keeps us in touch with cutting edge ideas and solutions that help us better serve our clients. 

The USCID Fall Conference

The USCID Fall Conference, on Implementing Sustainable Water Management, is open for registration.  The conference this year will be in Sacramento, October 1-4^th.  Please consider joining this important organization and attending our conference.  In addition to the “conference room” presentations providing valuable educational opportunities, the USCID planning committee has lined up some great tours.  Tuesday morning’s tour will head to Vacaville and visit the Solano Irrigation District.  Here we will learn what SID has done to modernize its irrigation system to bring more accurate delivery to its constituents. 

Friday’s tour, will head to Oroville Dam and Lundberg Family Farms.  Oroville is the tallest earth-fill dams in the United States at 770 feet high and 6920 feet long.  We experience the dam up close to learn about the spillway failure in 2017 and its emergency recovery and repair.  We will also learn about the importance of the dam in supporting agriculture, power generation and flood control. At Lundberg Family Farms, we will learn about the farming operations for various varieties of rice. We will learn about the Lundberg Family’s dedication to sustainability in crop nourishment and use of water.  Lundberg is a regenerative organic certified operation and has a goal of moving its organic operation to 100% regenerative organic certified by 2027.

Along with the tours, the planning committee has accepted around 30 presentations to bring you a well rounded conference focusing on Implementing Sustainable Water Management.  I am especially interested in learning some of these sustainable water management strategies as I hope to take them back to Nevada as we struggle with implementing a conjunctive management system on the Humboldt River.

We hope to see you there!

Therese

Issues that need Water Attorneys

Water right attorneys focus their practice on complex and important issues in Oregon, where all water belongs to the public. Anyone who wants to use water from any source, whether surface or groundwater, must obtain a permit or license from the Oregon Water Resources Department (OWRD), unless they qualify for a statutory exemption. In Oregon, water rights of use are based on the principle of prior appropriation. This means the first person to use water or apply for a permit has the senior priority. Under the pure prior appropriate system and in times of shortage, water users with the senior priority can demand the water specified in their right of use, regardless of the rights of use held by junior users.

Water users in Oregon include farms, vineyards, nurseries, livestock enterprises, dairies, single residences, homeowner’s associations and developments, cities, commercial businesses, and other entities. They may need legal assistance for various reasons, including obtaining, transferring, or defending water rights; complying with health and utility regulations; resolving disputes or enforcement actions by regulating agencies such as the Oregon Department of Water Resources; conducting due diligence for transactions or developments; and participating in rulemaking or legislative processes.

For a more detailed discussion of Oregon water rights, see this article. Or visit our blog.

What to Look For in a Water Attorney

When looking for an attorney for water rights in Oregon, there are several factors to consider, such as:

• Experience and expertise: Water law is a specialized and dynamic field that requires a thorough knowledge of the relevant statutes, rules, case law, and administrative procedures. An attorney who has experience and expertise in water law can help clients navigate the complex and often changing legal landscape. Practiced attorneys can provide effective representation and advice. Some indicators of experience and expertise include the attorney’s education, credentials, publications, memberships, awards, and testimonials.
• Fees and costs: Water law matters can be time-consuming and costly, depending on the complexity and scope of the issue. An attorney who is transparent and reasonable about their fees and costs can help the client budget and plan accordingly. Some attorneys may offer different fee arrangements, such as hourly, flat, contingent, or hybrid. This would depend on the nature and circumstances of the case. The client should discuss and agree on the fee arrangement with the attorney before hiring them.
• Reputation and rapport: Water law issues can be contentious and sensitive, especially when they involve competing or conflicting interests. An attorney who has a good reputation and rapport with the OWRD, other agencies, courts, and stakeholders can help the client achieve a favorable and timely resolution. Moreover, an attorney who is trustworthy, respectful, and professional can establish a rapport with the client and understand their goals and expectations.

Ways to Find an Oregon Water Attorney

To find an attorney for water rights in Oregon, the client can use various sources, such as:

• Referrals: The client can ask for recommendations from people they know and trust, such as friends, family, colleagues, or acquaintances, who have dealt with water law issues or hired an attorney for water rights in Oregon. Referrals can provide firsthand information and feedback about the attorney’s performance and personality.
• Online: Just use one of the various search engines like Google or Bing.
• Websites: The client can visit the websites of attorneys or law firms that specialize in water law in Oregon, such as Schroeder Law Offices. These websites often provide detailed information about their services, experience, expertise, and contact information. Websites can also showcase the attorney’s portfolio, publications, and achievements.
• Consultations: The client can contact and schedule consultations with potential attorneys for water rights in Oregon. Most will offer a free hour either by phone, Zoom, or in person, to discuss their specific issue and needs. Consultations are a good method to evaluate the attorney’s suitability and compatibility. Consultations also allow the client to ask questions and clarify any doubts or concerns they may have.

In Conclusion

In conclusion, finding an attorney for water rights in Oregon can be a challenging task. By considering the factors mentioned above and using the sources suggested, the client can make an informed and confident decision.

Disclaimer: This is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. The information provided is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. The client should consult with a licensed attorney in their jurisdiction before taking any legal action.

For more information please call +1 (800) 574-8813, use our convenient form, or visit the Water Law Blog.

See Also what to expect when you call a water attorney.

The Clean Water Act’s extension of what waters it attempts to regulate is leaves WOTUS a confusing legacy. Does it apply to wetlands? If so, what if wetlands stand alone and don’t adjoin navigable waterways? The courts have been adjudicating questions like these for year. But earlier this year the US Supreme Court gave a definitive answer – for now.

What Happened?

There is no denying the positive changes that the Clean Water Act has rendered as once flammable waters again being fishable, boatable, and even swimmable. Even so, the definition of “waters of the United States,” that defines the reach of the federal government’s regulation of water, is controversial. On May 25, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court decided in Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”)how “waters” are to be defined for purposes of the CWA.

Background

To understand Sackett, we must begin with looking at Rapanos v. United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006). Rapanos, found there are two tests to define “waters of the United States.”

• The “Plurality Test,” a two-prong test, that defines water of the United States as “(1) a relatively permanent body of water (2) connected to traditional interstate navigable waters.”
• The broader “significant nexus test.” Under this test “the wetlands, either alone or in combination with similarly situated lands, significantly affect the chemical, physical and biological integrity of the waters understood as “navigable,” are considered among the “waters of the US.”

The Sackett Decision

These two conflicting tests did not resolve the issue.

But now the May 2023, Supreme Court decision determined that the “Waters of the United States” extend “only to geographical features that are described in ordinary parlance as ‘stream, oceans, rivers, and lakes’ and to adjacent wetlands that are ‘indistinguishable’ from bodies of water due to a ‘continuous surface connection’.” Sackett v. EPA, 143 S. Ct. 1322, 1336 (2023). This decision adopted the plurality test from Rapanos reasoning that the significant-nexus text could grant endless jurisdiction and importantly interfere with State jurisdiction. 

WOTUS as a Confusing Legacy

The Supreme Court’s decision admitted there is obvious need for exceptions to it’s bright line rule such as when there are interruptions in surface connection because of low tide or dry spells to disrupt “continuous surface connection.”  Thus, it is evident that wetlands have not seen their last day in court.

As an ever evolving body, water law can be a confusing field. Here at Schroeder Law Offices, we help our clients by finding answers and making the complex appear simple. If you have any questions about how this affects your water rights, please contact us at (503) 281-4100 or m.jones@water-law.com.

            Schroeder Law Offices is pleased to announce that Kelsey Seibel has joined the firm as a new associate attorney in Portland, Oregon. Kelsey received her Juris Doctorate from the University of Denver Sturm College of Law in May 2021. She was admitted to the Oregon State Bar on February 24, 2022.

            Kelsey Seibel gained experience in water law through working on the University of Denver Water Law Review during law school, of which she served on the editorial board for two years as an Articles Editor. Kelsey also received a Bachelor of Arts in Economics and Environmental Studies from the University of Wisconsin – Madison. While studying for her Bachelor’s, Kelsey’s area of focus included environmental policy and history surrounding global environmental issues.

            Kelsey’s previous professional experience includes clerking for Judge Christine C. Antoun in the Colorado Judicial Branch Second Judicial District in Denver, Colorado. During her time, she was awarded “2022 Outstanding Courtroom Employee.”

            Kelsey grew up in Milwaukee, Wisconsin along Lake Michigan. When asked about her interest in water law, Kelsey says, “I always knew I wanted to work with natural resources and in the environmental law area. When I decided to go to the University of Denver for law school, I chose to write on the Water Law Review to learn more about water law and water rights in the west. I enjoy the area of water law because it combines my interests in efficient use of natural resources with sustainable growth and allocation of resources.”

            For fun, Kelsey enjoys outdoor activities like camping, running, and biking, as well as baking, cooking, and watching Wisconsin football.

            Kelsey could not be more excited to join Schroeder Law Offices and is determined to work as a passionate advocate to assist in all client needs.

What brought you to Schroeder Law Offices?

I had been interested in the legal field for some years before I started with Schroeder Law Offices. I was working in a different industry and was finally ready to make a change when I found SLO. Ultimately, it was the close-knit office culture, opportunities for education, and fascinating specialty that convinced me that this was where I was meant to be.

What is your go-to productivity trick?

I am a strict to-do list person. No matter how small the task is, it’s added to my list. If I really need to buckle down and focus on a large task I have found that listening to brown noise is extremely effective at calming and providing focus.

What is something you find fascinating about water law?

The first aspect that drew me in was the history. I love to research water rights, and it is also so interesting to learn about rights stemming from the early 20^th century and even earlier.

What do you like to do for fun on the weekends?

My favorite down time activity is spending time with my husband and my dog, either at home or exploring the trails in the Pacific Northwest. Otherwise, I like to binge watch a good television show and catch up on reading.

What is your favorite book or movie?

Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen.

What’s it like to work at Schroeder Law Offices?

Every day is a new adventure.

This weekend my brother Paul explained how he had successfully used Facebook Marketplace to sell extra furniture.  Wow, I thought, this is a great resource. But then a potential client called today.  The potential client posted For Sale by Owner on Facebook Marketplace without legal advice.  The problem was NOT with the platform, but with selling real property without professional help. 

Lawyers, title companies, real estate agents are expensive.  Many of the documents used in a real estate transaction can be bought for next to nothing online.  Tempting, but should you proceed without professional help?

Water rights, easements for access, well share agreements – they all need an experienced legal hand.  Even attorneys whose business is limited to real estate transactions often do not have the experience to advise on water use as it relates to real property. 

It’s a lot cheaper to hire legal help to do it right before your “For Sale by Owner” than after.  If you have a mistake the legal team will charge at their much higher litigation rates than at their more reasonable transactional rates.  If you are still unsure about needing professional help check out one of our webinars: Water-Related Disclosure Requirements – Schroeder Law Offices, PC (water-law.com)

Another thing: realize that your lawyer, title company and realtor are all having the same labor shortage as every business. Contacting your legal team before you put up your ad on Facebook Marketplace, Zillow, or another “For Sale by Owner” platform is a good plan.  Save yourself from improperly disclosing important information about your property, water rights and easements before you list!

April 22^nd, 2023, is the 53^rd annual Earth Day celebration. The theme of this year’s holiday is “Invest in Our Planet.” The preservation and efficient use of water, a vital natural resource, leads all that we do at Schroeder Law Offices. As a water law office, Schroeder assists municipal water users and districts, individual and family farms, and ranches to promote sustainable water use throughout Oregon, Nevada, Idaho, and Washington. To celebrate, let’s brush up on some Earth Day history.

The beginnings of Earth Day can be traced back to an oil spill off the coast of Santa Barbara in 1969. Because of its devastating effect on the surrounding nature and wildlife, the public’s concern over what could be done to protect the environment grew. After the spill, Wisconsin senator Gaylord Nelson inspired a nationwide “teach-in” day. Senator Nelson enlisted the help of a young activist Denis Hayes, fellow senator Pete McCloskey, and numerous volunteers and activists thereby creating the first Earth Day on April 22^nd, 1970. 20 million people celebrated the first holiday, prompting nationwide demonstrations, protests, and teach-ins.

Earth Day is now a global event celebrated each year through demonstrations, events, and acts of service!

To keep the mission of Earth Day in mind this year, Earthday.org created a list of the many ways you can take care of the earth in your day-to-day life. Some ideas you might try:

• Attending a tree planting event
• Participating in a community beach cleanup
• Planting a pollinator garden to help the population of bees, butterflies, and other organisms in your local ecosystem
• Attending an Earth Day event (find one in your area using this interactive map)
• Reading more on Earth Day history to explore the origins of the holiday

This weekend, please join us in celebrating Earth Day’s mission.

To stay up to date on all things water, be sure to subscribe to our weekly e-newsletter to the right.

What brought you to Schroeder Law Offices?

I came to Schroeder Law Offices right after graduating law school.  During my last year of school I was looking for a post-grad job related to natural resource law.  Having interned in jobs lobbying, in-house counsel for nonprofits, at an Attorney General’s Office, and at a large law firm, I knew I wanted to work in private practice, but in a boutique setting.

During my last semester of law school, I was working with The Freshwater Trust, a nonprofit in Portland, Oregon that does river restoration work. In that internship I had some exposure to water law and found it fascinating.  Schroeder was looking for an associate in Reno at the time. I was looking for a job in a location that would allow more of a rural lifestyle, so it was a perfect fit. I also loved that all the partners were women as this field is so often dominated by men.

What is your go-to productivity trick?

I am very to-do list oriented.  I tend to have one master list with all my projects and then one to two tiers of lists with more immediate tasks that need to be done in the next day or week.  A lot of my motivation comes from crossing something off a list.

What is something you find fascinating about water law?

Water law is one of the few niche practice areas that is incredibly diverse.  Unlike family or criminal law, where the issues, rules, and case law are often recycled, water law issues are always different.  In the last few years I have worked on property law, contract law, tort law, secured transaction law, tribal law, as well as federal issues like the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and historic rights-of-way across federal land. I’ve never enjoyed monotony in a job. At Schroeder, I’m certainly never bored and almost always challenged in a new way!

What do you like to do for fun on the weekends?

Outside of work I like to cook, read, and work in my garden or on my farm. I also like to get outside for an adventure with my hodge-podge pack of dogs. On longer breaks, I like to backpack or kayak with my husband, travel internationally to see new places, learn about history, and try new foods.

What is your favorite book or movie?

I don’t have an all-time favorite book or movie that comes to mind.  Lately, I’ve really enjoyed anything written by Kate Quinn.  I love her portrayals of women’s forgotten roles in history, especially during WWII. 

What’s it like to work at Schroeder Law Offices?

Working at Schroeder is working with a close-knit team. We help each other out and really care about one another as people.  I’ve always felt supported and heard. The leadership has always been invested in my growth as a professional and outside of work. They also encourage me to build and maintain a life outside of the office.

Caitlin Skulan is an associate attorney at Schroeder Law Offices, PC.

Water is a scarce resource, and its allocation and management is a complex legal issue. This complexity is particularly evident in Nevada, a state with a desert climate and a history of water disputes due to competing demands from various sectors. Such sectors include agriculture, mining, and urban development. A Nevada water attorney plays a crucial role in resolving such disputes. They ensure that the state’s water resources are allocated and managed efficiently and fairly.

In Nevada, water resources are managed by the Nevada Division of Natural Resources (NDWR). In this article, we will explore the role and responsibilities of Nevada water attorneys working with the Division. We will also explore how water attorneys work with suppliers and users of water.

What is a Nevada Water Attorney?

A Nevada water attorney, like Therese Ure Stix or Laura Schroeder at Schroeder Law Offices, PC is a lawyer who knows water law. Water law is a complex area of law that deals with the allocation, use, and management of water resources. Nevada water attorneys provide legal advice and representation to clients in matters related to water law. They represent clients in administrative proceedings, negotiate water rights agreements, and litigate disputes in court.

What do Nevada Water Attorneys do?

Water Rights

In Nevada, water attorneys help clients obtain and protect their water rights. Water rights are legal entitlements to use water from a particular source for a specific purpose. In Nevada, water rights are governed by the doctrine of prior appropriation. Prior appropriation means the first person to use the water for a beneficial purpose has priority over later users. Water attorneys help clients navigate the complex process of obtaining and maintaining water rights. For example, they help file applications with the Nevada State Engineer’s Office and negotiate water rights transfers.

Water Management

Nevada water attorneys advise clients on water management issues, including water conservation, groundwater management, and water quality. They help clients comply with state and federal water regulations. These include the Clean Water Act and the Safe Drinking Water Act. Additionally, water attorneys also help clients obtain permits for water-related projects, such as wells, dams, and water treatment facilities.

Water Disputes

Nevada water attorneys represent clients in disputes over water rights, water use, and water quality. They negotiate settlements, represent clients in administrative hearings, and litigate cases in state and federal court. Water disputes can be highly contentious, and water attorneys must have a deep understanding of water law and the technical aspects of water resources.

Environmental Law

Water attorneys also have expertise in environmental law, which is closely related to water law. They advise clients on environmental regulations and represent clients in environmental litigation. Environmental issues can have a significant impact on water resources, and water attorneys must understand the interplay between environmental and water law.

Conclusion

Nevada water attorneys like Therese or Laura play a crucial role in managing the state’s scarce water resources. They help clients obtain and protect their water rights, advise on water management issues, and represent clients in disputes and litigation. Water law is a complex and ever-changing area of law, and water attorneys must stay up-to-date on the latest legal developments and technical advancements in water resources management.

If you need or want to know more please use our convenient inquiry form and we will be happy to respond promptly. Or check out our article on what to expect when you call a law firm. You could also review this article.

Join the US Committee on Irrigation and Drainage (USCID) on April 12th, 2023 at 11:00 AM (Pacific Time) for a webinar on How to Obtain Title Transfer for Federal Water Projects. Frank Dimick, of Dimick Water Resources Engineering, will host the 30-minute presentation and Q+A session via Zoom. Participants will also learn how the United States can gain international recognition on water projects. After, Schroeder Law Offices’ shareholder and USCID Vice President Therese Stix will give an update on USCID and share more details about the upcoming USCID Conference in October 2023. We hope to see you there!

To learn more about USCID’s mission and upcoming conference, visit their website here.

Therese Stix has been appointed by its Board of Directors as Vice President of the United States Committee on Irrigation and Drainage.  USCID’s mission is to promote progressive and sustainable irrigation, drainage, and flood control practices in support of food and fiber production and public safety, recognizing that sustainability embodies economic, social, and environmental goals.  Therese was appointed to this position after stepping in to help USCID launch after a hiatus during the non-conference years of COVID and the retirement of the past executive director. 

Therese grew up on a row crop farm in eastern Oregon, is passionate about agricultural customs and culture, and continues to support farming and ranching operations in her law practice.  As Vice President, Therese will continue to take an active role in supporting the USCID’s mission while bringing the organization back online.

In addition, USCID is in the process of on boarding Jane Townsend from Ag Association Management Services to assist in promoting and pursuing USCID’s mission post-COVID. We are excited to have Jane assisting us and are currently planning our next conference to take place in Fort Collins, Colorado April 25-28, 2023.  We hope to see you there!

In the first year back since COVID-19, the Nevada State Bar, Environmental & Natural Resources Section held its Annual Meet & Greet event on November 3, 2022.  A social, after work event, honorees included Adam Sullivan (Nevada State Engineer), Micheline Fairbank (Nevada Deputy Administrator for Nevada Division of Water Resources), David Bobzien (Nevada’s Office of Energy), Jim Lawrence (Acting Director, Nevada Department of Conservation & Natural Resources), and Chad Blanchard (Federal Water Master for the Truckee & Carson Rivers).

Section members attending networked with our Nevada agency leads on a more personal level without the stresses of adversarial positions. During the event, Section leaders asked our honorees fun “icebreaker” questions such as: 1) What is your idea of perfect happiness? 2) With which historical person do you most identify? 3) What is your greatest extravagance? and, 4) Which talent would you most like to have?  Of course, these questions sparked fun answers that provided a glimpse into our leaders as people.  Spending time with these Nevada agency leaders on a personal level ultimately allows us to know and appreciate the work we all pursue. 

Schroeder Law Offices Shareholder Therese Stix, as a Co-Chairperson of the Environmental and Natural Resource Law section, is organizing and assisting the Section put on the annual Meet & Greet event.  This will be the first time meeting since COVID shut downs.  Section members are invited to attend this fun social event. For more information, contact Therese at therese@water-law.com!

On October 3^rd, 2022, the Supreme Court heard the oral argument for the first case of its 2022-2023 term: Sackett v. EPA. The case calls into question the definition of “Waters of the United States” (WOTUS), as it will decide the proper test to determine which wetlands are considered WOTUS, and therefore subject to federal regulation from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers under the Clean Water Act.

The case originated after Michael and Chantel Sackett purchased an Idaho property near Priest Lake in 2004. After the couple began building a home on the property in 2007, the EPA informed the Sacketts that they must stop construction and apply for a permit since their land contained a wetland that was adjacent to protected waters. Since the wetland is separated from Priest Lake by a road, the Sacketts claimed that their land is not subject to the Clean Water Act’s jurisdiction and sued the EPA. What followed is a legal battle that could potentially change which wetlands are considered WOTUS going forward.

The Clean Water Act was passed in 1972 in an effort to protect waters of the United States from pollution. Since then, the extent of protections provided by the Clean Water Act has been extensively questioned and changed. These changes  have been brought about by  Supreme Court rulings, plurality and concurring opinions of Supreme Court justices, and presidential administrations, especially those of Presidents Obama, Trump and Biden. 

The basis of both the Sacketts’ and EPA’s arguments can be found in the two waters tests proposed in the 2006 Supreme Court case Rapanos v. United States. The Sacketts have relied on the plurality opinion written by late Justice Antonin Scalia to support their case, which argued that wetlands should be considered WOTUS if the adjacent channels contained a “permanent” body of water such as a river, lake, or stream. Additionally, Justice Scalia argued that a wetland can only be considered WOTUS if it featured a “continuous surface connection” with a more permanent body of water.

The EPA is relying on retired Justice Anthony Kennedy’s concurring opinion in that same 2006 case. Justice Kennedy argued that wetlands must include a “significant nexus to navigable waters.” According to this definition, a wetland does not necessarily have to be continuously connected to navigable waters in order to be protected. Instead, the wetland must have a significant effect on the “chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the Nation’s waters.”

In response to  Sackett v. EPA, many agricultural groups have shared their experiences of uncertainty and hardship brought on by the shifting definition of WOTUS over the years. The Family Farm Alliance, along with other agricultural groups, including the USA Rice and National Association of Wheat Growers and the National Corn Growers Association, submitted an amicus (“friend of the court”) brief earlier this year to voice its perspective on the matter. The brief highlights the problems farmers and ranchers have faced due to the lack of clarity regarding the Clean Water Act’s jurisdiction, which has created confusion over whether waters on their property are subject to EPA and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regulation.

During the October 3^rd oral argument hearing for Sackett v. EPA, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson questioned the Sacketts’ legal counsel on the  difference between “abutting and neighboring wetlands” if the goal of the Clean Water Act is to protect the nations’ waters “chemical, physical, and biological integrity.” Justice Neil Gorsuch commented on the lack of clarity in the Clean Water Act’s definition of “adjacent,” which Justice Sonia Sotomayor pointed out made some of her colleagues critical of whether the term was “precise enough.” Justice Sotomayor went on to question whether there might be “another test that could be more precise and less open-ended” than the adjacency and significant nexus tests to determine which wetlands are protected. Sackett V. EPA, 21-454 U.S. (2022)  

As of now, Sackett v. EPA is pending adjudication before the Supreme Court. Considering the scope of the case, many expect the upcoming decision to have a significant impact on both environmental interests and the agricultural industry.

To learn more about wetlands and Clean Water Act jurisdiction, check out Schroeder Law Offices’ webinar on Wetlands: Due Diligence for Ditches, Drains and Ponds. 

            In our earlier blog, Schroeder Law Offices announced the Nevada Division of Environmental Protections’ (NDEP) workshop on Legislative Counsel Bureau (LCB) Draft R113-22.  LCB R113-22 proposed changes to Nevada’s water quality regulations for Nevada surface waters. 

            Now NDEP proposes to adopt additional regulations under the following LCB Numbers:  R114-22, R115-22, and R116-22 amending Chapter 445A of the Nevada Administrative Code for Standards for Water Quality.  More on the proposed regulations is available here.  Changes include setting site-specific selenium criteria for the Las Vegas Wash, adopting the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) drinking water standards for certain contaminants, and assigning beneficial uses and criteria better suited for flood-conveyance channels in Las Vegas.  

            NDEP announced a workshop for these new proposed regulations on October 19, 2022 from 1:00 PM to 3:00 PM.  The workshop will occur online and can be joined by this link or by calling in:

Phone Number: 1-775-321-611
Conference ID: 253-622-142#

            Public comment will be accepted during the workshop and written comments will be accepted until October 24, 2022.  Written comments can be submitted to:

Dave Simpson: dsimpson@ndep.nv.gov

Nevada Division of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Water Quality Planning
901 S. Stewart Street, Suite 4001
Carson City, Nevada 89701

P: (775) 687-9548  F: (775) 687-5856 

Public participation is an important aspect of creating Nevada law.  NDEP regulation changes are governed by the Nevada Administrative Procedure Act.  The agency must solicit and consider public comments in adopting new regulations.  If these issues affect you, Schroeder Law Offices encourages you to participate!

As of September 13^th, Oregon Water Resources Department Director Tom Byler has officially retired after 27 years working for the state of Oregon. A new OWRD director will be appointed by Oregon’s next governor. To serve for the remainder of her term, governor Kate Brown has appointed acting director Doug Woodcock, who previously worked as the Deputy Director of Water Management.  

During his tenure as the director, Tom Byler dedicated his time to modernizing the department’s programs and services to meet the Oregon community’s ever changing water needs. Byler also worked to increase OWRD’s capabilities to collect and analyze data to manage Oregon’s surface and groundwater resources throughout the state.

In the official press release regarding his retirement, Byler said, “As I look to the future of water resources in Oregon, I anticipate that water issues will continue to become more and more complex and challenging.” Byler added, “I am excited about the Department’s increasing capabilities to help communities address those issues.” Though he may be retiring from his current position, Byler intends to carry on his work in water and natural resources issues into his retirement.

The Oregon Water Resources Department is the state agency responsible for ensuring adequate and sustainable water supply to meet present and future needs. To learn more about OWRD, visit their website here: https://www.oregon.gov/owrd/. 

In the article “Trends in Clinical Legal Education Affecting Agriculture” by Caroline Lobdell and Scott Horngren, the authors provide a thorough look into the current state of environmental, agricultural, and animal law programs in law schools throughout the country. Though environmental law programs have steadily increased since the passage of groundbreaking environmental laws in the 1970s, the authors argue that these programs fail to offer a balanced education on agriculture and environmental law. Instead, they often focus exclusively on fighting for environmental causes. In doing so, they neglect to cover the interests of farmers, ranchers, and other natural resource users, who make up a huge part of environmental and agricultural interests.

Rather than viewing natural resource use as inherently wrong or not worthy of study, the article urges law programs to educate students on the interests of natural resource users and the cases they may come across in these industries as lawyers. In doing so, law students will get a more well-rounded understanding of environmental and agricultural issues, be better equipped to anticipate opposing arguments, and even work together with natural resource users in pursuing conservation efforts.  

To showcase the positive impact of a well-balanced environmental and agricultural education, the article uses Lewis & Clark’s Western Resource Legal Center (WRLC) as a case study. The law clinic, incorporated by Laura A. Schroeder, aimed to help students understand the interests of ranching, farming, timber, and other resource dependent industries. WRLC was later incorporated into Lewis & Clark to follow a seminar format to address legal issues affecting these industries in addition to an externship program that has partnered with the Oregon Farm Bureau, the Oregon Cattleman’s Association, American Forest Resource Council, Schroeder Law Offices, and others. With so many students willing to share positive experiences, the article makes a compelling argument for law schools to implement similar programs in their environmental law curriculums.  

WRLC’s founder and former Dean of Lewis and Clark Law School, James Huffman described the program as “a little boat that is finally afloat.”  On WRLC’s inception, Huffman stated “[t]here is a lot more to be done to make it seaworthy and expand the fleet, but it can be done.”  As budding law students with agricultural backgrounds, WRLC alumni, such as Schroeder Law Offices’ Associate Attorney Caitlin Skulan, were able to obtain a more balanced legal education as it pertains to the natural world and the resources we rely on. WRLC was a life raft in a sea full of environmental advocacy opinions on the Lewis and Clark campus.  The balance of working with farmers, ranchers, timber harvesters, and other sustainable natural resources users offers law students a reprieve from viewpoints that organizations like Farm Bureau and Cattlemen’s Associations are the villains of the environmental story. 

Similar to environmental advocacy focused clinics, students are still exposed to a whole host of environmental laws including the Endangered Species Act, the National Environmental Policy Act, the Clean Water Act, and state and federal Administrative Procedure Acts.  WRLC students have an opportunity to participate in real cases with the people who work and rely on natural resources and take pride in their roles as stewards of the land their livelihoods rely on.  As an employer of WRLC Alumni, Schroeder Law Offices hopes to see similar programs emerging at other law schools to better prepare future lawyers to represent our valued clientele.   

To learn more about WRLC and the current state of environmental, agricultural, and animal law programs, check out the link to the full article here.