Shareholder Therese Ure Stix recently visited the ancient aqueduct in Segovia, Spain. Built in the first century by the Roman Empire, it carried water over 16 km from La Acebeda to the Alcazar in Segovia.  The aqueduct is constructed with 20,400 stone blocks, no cement or mortar!  The aqueduct comprises 167 arches in all.  At its highest point is 28.5 meters above land surface.

It was declared a UNESCO World Heritage site in 1985. An amazing site to see for all of us water geeks! It can’t help but remind us of the importance of water in ancient times to present!

For more information see Aqueduct of Segovia | World Monuments Fund (wmf.org)

Back by popular demand is Schroeder Law Office’s FREE live webinar series.  The 2021 VACCINE series follows the 2020 COVID-19 series. It will span across seven topics of water law. 

The first webinar of the series, Contracting Out-of-Boundary Water and Wastewater Services will take place on Tuesday, May 18, 2021 from noon to 1:00 PM, Pacific time.  Laura Schroeder and Caitlin Skulan will discuss contracting water and wastewater services outside a municipal or utility service boundary in Oregon, Nevada, and Idaho. The discussion will include when out of boundary contracting can occur, the duties owed to those inside and out of boundary, and other terms that should be included in these agreements. Participants will also learn about the pros and cons of out-of-boundary contracts. Attendees must pre-register for this webinar here!

Future VACCINE webinar topics will inlcude:

• Tuesday, June 22^nd—What to Do When There Is No Water: Drought Tools Explained;
• Tuesday, July 13th —What Terms to Include in a Well Share Agreement?
• Tuesday, August 3rd – How to Take Advantage of a Winter Appropriation Using Storage;
• Tuesday, September 14—Due Diligence for Canal, Pond, and Drainage Maintenance: Wetlands Delineation;
• Tuesday, October 19—How to Change or Remove an Easement (Ditch, Road, Well Share) from Real Estate; and
• Tuesday, November 9—Should or Can You Take Stormwater into Your Existing System?

Afterward, webinars are available here.  Schroeder Law Offices gives you “on demand” access to educational content while maintaining social distance!  Stay tuned to the Schroeder Law Offices blog for announcements about the upcoming webinars.  If you have any problems with registration or viewing, please contact Scott Borison at: scott@water-law.com. 

This post is one of a series highlighting the ways in which water users have adapted to life in the time of COVID-19.

Shelley Roberts is the CEO of the Idaho Rural Water Association (“IRWA”). IRWA is a resource for small water systems in the State of Idaho that offers training for drinking water and wastewater operators and aids those systems in times of need. Their objective is “to ensure Idaho’s rural communities are safe while still maintaining the high quality of life we hold so dear.”

For Shelley, the best part of working with IRWA has been the same since day one. As someone with a business background, she loves being able to utilize her education by running a non-profit corporation benefiting others. “I’ve never met such salt of the earth people as I have in the water industry,” she says. “They are all so genuine, caring, and kind.”

COVID-19’s impact on IRWA started during its Spring Conference in March, 2020, which concluded on Friday, March 13- the same day the Federal Government declared a state of emergency. The following Monday, all of IRWA’s administrative staff were directed to stay home. The week after, IRWA organized a work from home policy that allowed employees to perform their duties remotely. For IRWA’s circuit riders, though, it was a different story.

Drinking water and wastewater are essential services, and adjustments had to be made to ensure they continued to run smoothly. IRWA employs numerous circuit riders and field staff whose jobs require in-person and onsite contact with water system operators. However, thanks to video conferencing technology, much of their communications with the operators could be conducted remotely, limiting potential exposure. When site visits were required, field staff practiced social distancing as much as possible, including staying 6 feet apart and wearing face masks.

An unexpected benefit of remote work was an increased ability not only to contact the systems but for internal communication between IRWA’s employees, office and field staff alike. “We learned how to use Teams and started having weekly video conferences,” Shelly told us. “We weren’t able to do that before. It was nice for everyone [at IRWA] to have more contact with each other.”

According to Shelley, one of the biggest impacts COVID-19 had was fear of “what ifs.” The ability to communicate with water systems in remote locations without having to travel allowed the circuit riders to discuss those concerns quickly and determine what steps were needed to resolve any issues.

Another of IRWA’s major concerns was operator availability. Many of the small systems IRWA works with are operated by volunteers who have other commitments to day jobs and families. Should those operators fall ill or otherwise become unable to perform their duties, it can be difficult to find other operators to fill in.

IRWA has long worked with the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) to locally administer the water/wastewater agency response network, otherwise known as WARN. In response, through WARN, IRWA was able to put together a list of volunteers who could assist if a system’s regular operator was not available.

Shelley says that IRWA’s response to COVID-19 did not greatly differ from their response to other emergencies in which the first step is typically outreach and communication with the systems IRWA works with. For example, on March 21, 2020, a magnitude 6.5 earthquake struck central Idaho. Circuit riders needed immediate contact with water systems to assess any potential damage caused by the quake. Luckily, the remote communication procedures implemented in response to COVID-19 allowed IRWA’s circuit riders to easily check in with system operators.

While the pandemic continues to impact daily life and operations for IRWA in general and Shelley personally, she looks forward to life after COVID-19. Professionally, she awaits opening up the new training center in Boise, Idaho IRWA constructed just prior to the shutdown. The center will host hands-on trainings for water and wastewater operators in addition to traditional classroom training. As for her personally? Being able to hug her friends and extended family.

Shelley participated in a panel discussion on the pandemic’s impact on the Idaho water sector as a part of the Idaho Association of Cities’ 2020 virtual conference, which you can watch in full here. For more information about IRWA, including details for upcoming trainings, check out their website here. And stay tuned to Schroeder Law Offices’ blog for more posts in this series and other water-related issues!

The State of the Water Industry Survey

In the June 2020 issue of Opflow, the American Water Works Association published a survey of 3,351 water industry professionals. The State of the Water Industry (SOTWI) survey identifies challenges to the water industry and seeks to understand their causes.

Several issues regarding water resource management made the top ten concerns of the industry professionals surveyed. “Long-term water supply availability” was the third-highest ranked issue on the list at #3, followed closely by “watershed/source water protection” (#5) and “groundwater management and over-use’ (#10).

Water Demand

Specifically, 57 percent of surveyed respondents indicated that their utilities could meet anticipated long-term water demand. However, about 12 percent of respondents claim that it will be challenging to meet future supply needs. This uncertainty creates reverberating effects throughout the industry. Uncertainty affects many other aspects of water resource management and quality, including the other issues mentioned in the survey. Future supply shortfalls will lead to increased price and competition as well as the potential for more frequent litigation over water rights.

Source Water Protection

In addition, source water protection was another critical issue for water resource managers. 76 percent of utility respondents to the survey said that they had implemented or were implementing a source water protection program. When considering only large utility respondents, that share increased to 89 percent. Clearly, utilities focus on strong source water protection programs. These programs are often cost-effective ways to protect and improve both water quality and quantity. Further, states are generally responsible for implementing water quality standards under the Safe Drinking Water and Clean Water Acts for drinking water. Recently, the AWIA, America’s Water Infrastructure Act amended the Safe Drinking Water Act, signed into law in 2018.

Groundwater

Finally, this was the second consecutive year that groundwater issues were front and center in the survey. 2019 California drought and wildfire conditions stressed groundwater resources, bringing those issues to the front of many survey respondents’ minds. Those issues show no signs of abating, as drought and wildfires continue to ravage the West.

In conclusion, many of the challenges highlighted by survey respondents are similar to those faced by water resource managers throughout the years. While there may be some cause for concern in certain areas, overall the survey shows a positive outlook for the future. Utilities are using existing water resources more efficiently as they comply with the AWIA, protect their water sources, and engage in asset management planning. The water industry has poised itself to meet its challenges with resilience.

This blog was drafted with the assistance of Drew Hancherick, a current law student attending Lewis and Clark Law School.

In the eighth COVID-19 webinar, Laura Schroeder, Michelle Owen, and Scott Revell discussed various types of water organizations. The webinar aired originally on June 3, 2020 from 12:00 PM to 1:00 PM. You can view the webinar here!

Above all, learn the differences between public and private water organizations. For instance, the panelists will provide examples of the different types of public and private water management organizations. Further, the presentation reviews the generally applicable rules pertaining to public water agencies and regulatory oversight of private water utilities. Generally, topics will include:

• Types of Water Management Organizations
  • Residential and domestic
  • Irrigation
  • Flood control and drainage
• Comparing Public and Private Water Management
  • Formation, organization, and dissolution
• Public Water Organizations
  • Municipal, irrigation, domestic, and flood control agencies in Oregon, Nevada, and Washington
  • Applicable laws, rules, and requirements for public agencies
• Private Water Organizations
  • Corporations, ditch companies, and community water systems
  • Different agencies providing oversight of private water management organizations

Afterwards, we posted our webinars in the COVID-19 Series here, giving you “on demand” access to Schroeder Law Office’s educational events under the “social distancing” orders! Additionally, the COVID-19 Webinar series continued over several weeks covering topics, including livestock water rights on public lands. If you can’t make it, stay tuned to our blog for announcements for information about the next webinars or watch the webinars later on our website. If you have any issues with registration or viewing the webinars, please contact Scott Borison at: scott@water-law.com.

The city of Anacortes, WA, is making news by running part of its new fiber optic cable network through its water system.

Brown and Caldwell’s Water News for September 25, 2019, links to a report by KUOW News: “Wifi wires will run through water pipes in northern Washington town.” This “first in North America” system, according to Fred Buckenmeyer, Director of Public Works for Anacortes, has already connected Anacortes with neighboring city, Mt. Vernon.

Richard Walker, of goanacortes.com, writes: “installation of the first fiber optic cable began April 8, using a method commonly used in Europe … using conduit installed in active water lines.” According to KUOW’s report, the internet tube is encased in the same plastic as the water pipe.

Buckenmeyer continues, “Like having a water pipe inside a water pipe. No chance of contamination or anything like that.”

It is also being touted as a way to reduce costs such as eliminating the need to dig under Washington State’s Skagit River, the Swinomish Slough and “15 miles of farms, wetlands, streets and sidewalks along the way.”

Jacqueline Allison, also of goanacortes.com, writes that this is intended to provide a fiber optic telemetry enabling communication between fire stations, water stations and other city facilities.

The city will sell the unused broadband capacity to consumers as part of a municipal wifi network. Interest in connecting to this growing network has already been expressed by Island Hospital in Anacortes, and Western Washington University in Bellingham, among others. The city is hoping to entice customers from commercial internet providers. According to project manager Jim Lemberg, if they can capture a third of the commercial market, the project will “pay for itself in 15 years.”

Stay tuned to Schroeder Law Office blog for water law and water updates all year long.

As most of us are aware, Earth Day has become a global occurrence for which communities host events throughout the week of the holiday. This year, Earth Day fell on Monday, April 22, and communities around the world hosted festivities such as community clean-ups, tree-plantings, and educational events that focused on climate literacy and bringing awareness to climate science for the purpose of encouraging individuals to participate in the preservation of our communities.

Though celebrated annually, Schroeder Law Offices’ (“SLO”) mission includes providing services to those that feed our communities and we consider environmental preservation on a day-to-day basis. SLO works daily with clients such as municipal water users and districts, corporations, and both individual and family farmers to maximize production and efficiency of water use. As we like to say, we do EVERYTHING water!

For ideas on how you can take action for making every day an Earth Day, visit the Earth Day Network’s website for ideas and to learn about “A Billion Acts of Green,” the campaign to reach 3 billion acts of green for the Earth Day holiday’s 50th anniversary in 2020.

Research indicates that planting additional trees may have huge benefits in generating rainfall, thus, consider spending time outside this spring and plant a tree with the goal of bringing freshwater to your community!

When most of us think about the changing seasons, we think about the change in weather. When we think about the transition to Summer, we think about the days getting warmer. When we think about the transition to Winter, we think about the days getting colder. There is much more to changing seasons than changes in weather.

According to Merriam-Webster, the definition of a season is “a period of the year characterized by or associated with a particular activity or phenomenon.” Examples of this definition include a period associated with activities of agriculture such as growth or harvesting, irrigation seasons, periods when animals engage in certain activities like migration, birth of offspring, and moving from high “summer” country to low “winter” country. In life, one can characterize the seasons with the circle of life with birth or renewal in the spring and death, hibernation and sleep in the winter. There are so many ways we can perceive these natural changes each year.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration points out that seasonal changes in turn affect soil moisture, evaporation rates, river flows and lake levels. The subsequent changes in vegetation also affect the amount and kinds of crops and food available for humans, animals and other organisms.

The effects of seasonal changes also present potential risks. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (“FEMA”) provides warnings of risks presented in the seasonal change to Spring. FEMA notes that while Spring typically brings warmer weather and longer days, it also brings risk associated with heavy rains, severe weather and rapid snowmelt that can lead to flooding and/or damage to levees and dams. For more information concerning risks and protection from spring flooding, please visit FEMA’s “What You Should Know” at https://www.ready.gov/sites/default/files/Spring_Flood_Fact_Sheet.pdf.

So, as the seasons change and we swap out our wardrobe for the changing temperature, lets remember a change in season is so much more than just a change in weather.

Each year during the month of March, the United Nations (“UN”) hosts a “World Water Day.” Friday, March 22nd marks 2019’s World Water Day focusing on sustainable water development goals for everyone by 2030. Annually, the UN hosts World Water Day to bring attention to the world’s water crisis and address reasons why so many people are left without clean drinking water. A series of international events are scheduled to call attention to the world’s water crisis and offer forums to exchange ideas regarding water availability through sustainable development.

As 2019’s theme is “Leaving no one behind,” the UN has made resources available to the public to explore the theme – what the problem is, how it relates to water, what “safe water” means, and why it’s so important as a human right. The UN’s notes that more than 2.1 billion people live without safe water at home, and as many as approximately 4 billion people (nearly two-thirds of the world’s population) experience severe water scarcity at least one month of the year. In effort to combat the possibility of 700 million people worldwide being displaced by intense water scarcity by the year 2030, this year’s theme focuses on what can be done to include all demographics in conversations about water development and recognizing the right to water for all people.

The “Fact Sheet” on World Water Day 2019 shows us how we can be involved, whether it’s sharing resources or through organizing events or activities. There is also a list of events found at their website, both local and international. Though many of the currently scheduled events are taking place internationally, sharing information with those around you is equally important.

The 20th annual National Groundwater Awareness Week will occur between March 10 – March 16, 2019, and this year’s theme for awareness is “Think.” Though a simple theme, through “Think,” the National Groundwater Association (“NGWA”) urges us to “think” about how we impact our groundwater resources in our everyday lives.

For National Groundwater Awareness Week 2019, NGWA encourages us to consider small steps taken to improve the general public’s awareness of groundwater use and its importance in our every day lives, i.e. “Think” about not running the water while you brush your teeth, or, “Think” about fixing the leaking faucet. Sometimes it’s the smallest things that makes the biggest differences!

Taking steps to conserve and protect groundwater is of utmost importance to all as we depend upon groundwater for basic needs. According to NGWA research, approximately 132 million American rely on groundwater for drinking water. Besides drinking water, groundwater consists of a major resource in food and power production, including irrigation, livestock, manufacturing, mining, thermoelectric power, and many other resources. NGWA offers the following facts for consideration:

• Americans use 79.6 billion gallons of groundwater each day.
• Groundwater makes up 20 to 30 times more water than all U.S. lakes, streams, and rivers combined.
• 44 percent of the U.S. population depends on groundwater for its drinking water supply.
• More than 13.2 million households have their own well, representing 34 million people.

“Think” about that!

As a part of 2019’s Groundwater Awareness Week, NGWA will be participating in the Water Resources Congressional Summit to bring federal support for groundwater awareness. Topics for the summit will focus on bringing federal support for detection and remediation regarding PFAS contamination, increasing efforts to promote groundwater recharge, and bolstering support for drinking water infrastructure improvement. More information and educational tools on the 2019 summit topics can be found at the NGWA’s online database.

“Think” about what you might do to bring groundwater awareness to your friends and family!

At the end of 2018, the Oregon Water Resources Commission adopted new rules to facilitate small municipal water suppliers’ completion of Water Management and Conservation Plans (“WMCP”). The Oregon Water Resources Department (“OWRD”) stated the new Oregon Administrative Rules (“OAR”), OAR 690-086-0300 to 0370, are intended to provide more flexibility for small municipal water suppliers to meet water conservation and curtailment objectives. Small municipal water suppliers in turn hope the new rules will reduce complexity to lessen the financial and staffing challenges previously associated with completing a WMCP.

WMCPs are only required to be submitted to OWRD if required by a water right permit condition, a Final Order approving a permit extension of time, or a Final Order approving a previous WMCP. While WMCPs are otherwise optional, OWRD encourages submission as a way to pursue long term water supply planning.

A Small Municipal Water Supplier is defined under the new OARs as: (1) a municipal water supplier that serves a population of less than 1,000 people or has less than 300 service connections, and (2) within the previous 5 years, the system’s maximum daily demand or maximum instantaneous rate, has not exceeded 2 million gallons per day or 3.1 cubic feet per second.[1] If a water supplier satisfies that definition, then it may be able to complete an “Alternate Municipal WMCP” in accordance with the new OARs.

Rather than submitting a regular WMCP, an Alternate Municipal WMCP may be submitted by a Small Municipal Water Supplier, if in order to meet current and projected demand in the next 10 years the supplier will not need to:

• Acquire a new water right; or
• Expand or initiate diversion of water allocated under an Extended Permit.[2]

Another notable change in the WMCP OARs is the revision to the annual Water Audit provisions. If a Municipal Water Supplier notes Water Losses exceed 10 percent within 2 years of approval of its WMCP, the supplier must undertake steps to explain the losses and remedy the situation.[3] However, Small Municipal Water Suppliers completing an annual Water Audit need only remedy losses if the Water Losses exceed 15 percent and the supplier serves a population greater than 300 people or has more than 100 service connections.[4]

Therefore, Small Municipal Water Suppliers that must soon complete a WMCP should determine whether an Alternate Municipal WMCP is appropriate, and what impact the new OARs will have on the supplier as it completes its WMCP. Schroeder Law Offices frequently works with municipal water suppliers and consultants to ensure WMCPs comply with the OARs and to assist in obtaining OWRD’s approval.

[1] OAR 690-086-0030(8).

[2] OAR 690-086-0300(1).

[3] OAR 690-086-0150(4)(e).

[4] OAR 690-086-0350(4)(e).

On July 11 and 12, 2018, attorney Laura Schroeder and paralegal Rachelq Harman travelled to Caldwell and Twin Falls, Idaho, respectively, for the Idaho Rural Water Association’s (“IRWA”) annual Water Law to YOU Road Show to educate water users and managers all about their municipal water rights. The 6 hour classes discussed the basics of owning, maintaining, and utilizing water rights, along with tips on avoiding potential associated issues such as easement disputes and involuntary forfeiture. The classes also touched on recent developments in Idaho water law, and the status of the State’s multiple ongoing adjudications.

IRWA hosted these presentations that were offered as continuing education credits to satisfy both drinking water and wastewater CEU requirements. Some attendees also planned to seek real estate and/or attorney CE credits for those professional licenses. Attendees came from a variety of backgrounds, including ditch association managers, wastewater treatment operators, and even fellow water law attorneys!

Laura Schroeder’s new class incorporated additional information related to Idaho Department of Environmental Quality’s (“IDEP”) assumption of Idaho’s water quality program from the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”). Due to this recent development and the continuing efforts of the Idaho Department of Water Resources (“IDWR”) on the north Idaho adjudications, the class’s focus was expanded from water rights basics. Active participation from students in each session made each presentation unique, and allowed a focus on material of specific relevance and interest to each group.

While this year’s Road Show has come to an end, there are plenty of upcoming opportunities to brush up on your water rights education. Check out Schroeder Law Office’s events page to learn where you can find us next, and stay tuned to Schroeder Law Offices’ blog for more information on upcoming events and water law developments!

On February 1, 2018, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the “groundwater conduit theory,” whereby a discharge of pollutants into groundwater that is fairly traceable to a navigable surface water is the functional equivalent of a discharge directly into the navigable water body for the purpose of regulation under the Clean Water Act. This argument has been proffered many times in the past, but prior to this case this theory had, at best, narrow and limited success. The full Ninth Circuit case is available here.

The case involved the County of Maui, Hawaii and its wastewater treatment plant. The plant uses four wells as its primary means of disposing effluent into groundwater and the Pacific Ocean. The County injects three to five million gallons of treated wastewater per day into its wells, and, according to the County’s expert, when the County injects 2.8 million gallons of effluent per day, the amount of effluent that reaches the ocean is 3,456 gallons per meter of coastline per day. The Court stated this is “roughly the equivalent of installing a permanently-running garden hose at every meter along the 800 meters of coastline.”

Discharges of pollutants may be authorized by permit under the Clean Water Act’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”). Jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act requires three things: 1) addition of a pollutant 2) to a navigable water 3) from a point source. This case focuses on the third requirement. Clean Water Act cases hold that a point source is a discernible, confined, and discrete conveyance, which in a lot of cases really means a pipe, ditch, or canal.

Wells do not directly connect to navigable water (in this case, the Pacific Ocean). Instead, the water injected into wells must travel through groundwater to reach the ocean. In 2013, the EPA, Army Corps of Engineers, Hawaii Department of Health, and University of Hawaii conducted what is called a “tracer dye study.” Essentially, they put dye into the wells and then monitored the ocean for the dye. At its conclusion, the study found a hydraulic connection between two of the wells and the ocean.

The Ninth Circuit concluded that point source discharges that travel indirectly through groundwater to a navigable water, is a violation of the Clean Water Act if the discharger does not have a permit. The Court reasoned that “this case is about preventing the County from doing indirectly what it cannot do directly.” Since the County could not build a waste pipe that emptied directly into the ocean without a permit, it could do so indirectly through its wells to avoid the requirements of the Clean Water Act. 

There are currently cases before the Fourth and Sixth Circuits which also implicate the groundwater conduit theory. If the holding by the Ninth Circuit is adopted by other Circuits, it will represent a change for the NPDES permitting program and regulation under the Clean Water Act. On the other hand, if a split develops in the Circuits, it may lead to litigation in the United States Supreme Court.

Stay tuned to Schroeder Law Offices’ Water Law Blog for more water news!

This article was drafted with the assistance of Law Clerk Derek Gauthier, a student at Lewis & Clark Law School.

In November 2017, the United States Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) published the Willamette Basin Review Feasibility Study, Draft Integrated Feasibility Report and Environmental Assessment (Study). The purpose of the Study (which can be viewed in its entirety here) is to evaluate the reallocation of 1,590,000 acre-feet of Willamette Valley Project stored water. The Study analyzes current and future water demand in the Willamette basin to determine how the water should be reallocated. The analyzed demand uses include agricultural irrigation, municipal and industrial water supply, and conservation storage for Endangered Species Act listed fish. 

The Corps constructed a series of thirteen federal reservoirs in the middle and upper Willamette Basin beginning in the 1930s. Currently, the water is stored under Bureau of Reclamation water use rights that authorize storage for irrigation. The Corps’ proposal would reallocate 962,800 acre-feet of water to fish and wildlife. This discrete category has been allocated the most water in the draft Study, followed by agricultural irrigation at 253,950 acre-feet, and municipal and industrial with the least at 73,300 acre-feet.

For those keeping score at home, those figures do not add up to the allocated 1,590,000 acre-feet. The Corps chose to earmark 299,950 acre-feet to what the agency is classifying as “joint-use.” Joint use allocation is water that can be assigned to any of the other three discrete categories. Thus, the Corps would simply hold that amount in reserve to accommodate “unforeseeable changes to demand trends.” Simply put, this provides the Corps flexibility in the future to disperse water according to demand while simultaneously allowing the agency to avoid allocating all of the water at the current time.

While everyone can agree more water available for appropriation is a good thing, some are unhappy about the way the Corps has proposed to allocate stored water. The Capital Press reported the Oregon Farm Bureau’s position is that water allocated to agricultural irrigation is “not nearly enough.” 

There is still much uncertainty about what will happen next and how long the process will take before water stored in the Willamette Valley Project is available for appropriation. The Study is currently a draft environmental assessment under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Therefore, the Corps is still in the stage where it is developing and evaluating the alternatives. The comment period on the draft Study closed on January 5, 2018.

If the Corps finds no significant impact from the chosen alternative action in the NEPA process, water will then need to be reallocated to the proposed uses. Because the Bureau of Reclamation currently holds the water right certificates that authorize storage for irrigation, the federal agencies must go through the Oregon Water Resources Department’s transfer review process to change the purposes of use for the Project storage rights.

Only after the water use rights authorizing storage in the Project are transferred to the reallocated uses will the water be available for new appropriations in addition to the current authorized use, irrigation. The reallocation could stimulate a rush to the Oregon Water Resources Department’s office for application submission. As the old adage goes, “the early-bird gets the worm.” More aptly, those ready to file for a water right upon the successful completion of the impending process are more likely to get to obtain a much-coveted water use right from the reallocated storage.

Stay tuned to Schroeder Law Offices’ Water Law Blog as this process unfolds!

This article was drafted with the assistance of Law Clerk Derek Gauthier, a student at Lewis & Clark Law School.

The American Water Works Association (AWWA), Pacific Northwest Section’s October meeting focused on seismic resiliency and emergency preparedness by discussing strategies implemented by the Willamette Water Supply Program in building a water delivery system that should withstand a disaster.

The meeting emphasized the importance of building a water supply distribution system on soils that will be less prone to shifting when a disaster, such as an earthquake, strikes. Discussion also ensued relating to a new type of water supply pipe that can withstand ground motion and deformation.

The presentation encouraged all entities in the water delivery sector, no matter at what stage in the water supply distribution process they are involved, to prepare a disaster plan and to develop infrastructure in a way that will withstand the forces of a disaster with minimal damage.

In attending this meeting, it was evident how important it can be to look at not only the minor legal aspects of a client’s current issue, but also to understand and know how the client operates their system. Knowing and understanding the “Big Picture” will allow us to engage in discussions on seismic resiliency and disaster preparedness for our purveyor clients.

By Derek Bradley

Most municipalities have water use permits reserved for their current needs and projected future growth, typically in the form of one or more municipal water rights of use or permits. These water use permits have timelines for the cities to fully develop the beneficial use entitlement. Based on current population and use, cities may not be able to apply the full volume of water to beneficial use by the timeline allowed in the water permit. In order to retain the volume allowed and priority of the water use permit, a municipality may request an extension of time from the Oregon Water Resources Department (OWRD) for additional time to develop the volume of water allowed in their permit.

The Oregon Senate is currently considering Senate Bill 712 (SB712) that could impact how much of the permitted but undeveloped portion is available for future development by Oregon municipalities.  This bill concerns municipal water permits requiring extensions for development that currently are subject to fish persistence conditions, or restrictions on water use to maintain stream flows for wildlife.

SB712 is in response to a 2013 Oregon Court of Appeals ruling, WaterWatch of Oregon v. OWRD, 259 Or. App. 717, decided on December 11, 2013.  In this case, the Court held that the reference to “undeveloped portion of the permit” in ORS 537.230(2), which was passed in 2005 as House Bill 3038,  “is to be measured by reference to the maximum rate of water applied to beneficial use before the expiration of the document deadline in the permit or last-issued extension.” Id. at 742.  The Court’s holding required the fish persistence condition to apply to all water use  not yet  put to beneficial use when the municipality’s previous permit terms or extension expired. For example, if a city held a water right of use by permit to 10 cubic feet per second (cfs) and can demonstrate use of 3 cfs at the time the permit condition expired for development, a condition in granting an extension of time would require fish persistence conditions attached to the remaining 7 cfs.

If the legislature passes SB712, this extension system will change so that the undeveloped portion of the water right permit will be considered to be the volume of water being used by either December 11, 2013, or the time specified to complete construction to perfect the water right in the permit or last approved extension. This alters the quantity of water subject to fish persistence conditions to a specific set date for all municipality extension applicants which would hopefully limit the current unending rounds of litigation that the municipal extensions are currently requiring. This change would also eliminate the large backlog of permit extension applications presently pending with OWRD.  Without this change many cities will have conditions placed on water use they have already begun putting to beneficial use because of the large lag time between expiration of the permit terms and granting of the extension application.  This bill would keep municipalities from the retroactive application of fish persistence conditions being applied to water use presently in use, with some of that usage dating back to the 90s.

Some groups focused on fish habitat view this bill as an attempt to change the terms of the 2005 compromise bill.  However, the intervening litigation since passage of the 2005 act illustrates that the “fish persistence” requirement is procedurally unworkable.  In the meantime, the Oregon courts continue to refuse to adopt the “growing communities” doctrine that would have mitigated the issues presented by the “fish persistence” ideals of fish habitat advocates.

Of course, municipalities are interested in having as much water available for development for their future growth as possible. In addition, the large investment municipalities must make require them to experience as little disruption as possible. This bill seems particularly fair to smaller municipalities that have limited resources to litigate the nuances of the “fish persistence” requirement and need their dollars to invest in water infrastructure with their less flexible water supplies and interconnects to other municipalities and sources.

While it is easy to see the concern of groups opposing SB712, (as it can take well over a decade for an extension to be approved and a municipality can increase their water usage substantially in that time), passage of SB712 will ultimately affect only a small amount of Oregon’s surface source waters.  Once all the current applications are processed by OWRD, all undeveloped municipal permits will have at least a portion of their permitted volumes subject to fish persistence conditions.  With a substantial backlog in extension applications (some cases extending over a decade and a half in water investments already made by some municipalities), SB712 will provide certainty for this state’s towns and cities as they plan how to manage their water use and development for future growth.

On December 31, 2014, the Oregon Court of Appeals decided WaterWatch of Oregon Inc., v. Water Resources Department, 268 Or. App. 187 (2014). The Court of Appeals reviewed three final orders for extensions of time for municipal water permits in the Clackamas River. After contested case hearings, the Water Resources department granted the extensions, subject to fish persistence conditions. WaterWatch of Oregon sought judicial review of the final orders granting the extension, challenging, among other things, the adequacy of fish persistence conditions.

As a matter of first impression, the court interpreted ORS 537.230(2)(c), which states:

“[T]he department finds that the undeveloped portion of the permit is conditioned to maintain, in the portions of waterways affected by water use under the permit, the persistence of fish species listed as sensitive, threatened or endangered under state or federal law. * * *.”

After extensive review of the legislative history of the statute, the court concluded that “the legislature intended that the undeveloped portions of the permits be subject to conditions—that is, fulfillment of the conditions are a prerequisite to diversion of the undeveloped portions—that preserve from decline the continued existence, or endurance, of listed fish species.”

The court interpreted the term “maintain * * * the persistence of fish species,” to focus on the “longterm preservation or endurance of fish population health in the affected waterway. . . . It does not express a policy that no habitat may be impaired or that no individual fish may be allowed to perish or leave.” So while the conditions imposed on a municipal extension of time to maintain fish persistence are required prior to diverting the undeveloped portion of the permit, the conditions must preserve from decline listed fish species over the long-term.

On July 15, the California State Water Boards passed Resolution No. 2014-0038 to adopt urban water control regulations. These regulations are aimed at conservation for urban residents, providing fines for using water inconsistent with the conservation measures. Among the measures aimed at curbing water use, the Water Board has proposed restricting activities on individuals including:

(1) The application of potable water to outdoor landscapes in a manner that causes runoff such that water flows onto adjacent property, non-irrigated areas, private and public walkways, roadways, parking lots, or structures;

(2) The use of a hose that dispenses potable water to wash a motor vehicle, except where the hose is fitted with a shut-off nozzle or device attached to it that causes it to cease dispensing water immediately when not in use;

(3) The application of potable water to driveways and sidewalks; and

(4) The use of potable water in a fountain or other decorative water feature, except where the water is part of a recirculating system.

Performing any of the above activities subjects the offender to civil fines or criminal penalties (as a criminal infraction), punishable by a fine of up to five hundred dollars ($500) for each day in which the violation occurs.

Additionally, urban water suppliers and public water suppliers are required to implement water restrictions on outdoor irrigation of ornamental landscapes or turf with potable water. Under the restrictions, ornamental landscaping and turf cannot be irrigated for no more than two days per week.

The regulations are planned to take effect on August 1, 2014 following review from the Office of Administrative Law, and the restrictions will be active for a period of 270 days (nine months), unless water availability conditions change.

As the drought in the Western US continues, communities can expect to see more of these types of water control regulations moving forward.

For more information, see the California Water Board’s Media Release.