Katherine Schroeder is crossing the United States for the second time on her bicycle. This week at the headwaters of the Mississippi, she encountered the sculpture titled “Heartwaters – Caretaker Woman.” The bronze sculpture was created by artist and member of the Fond du Lac Band Jeff Savage in 2005.

The sculpture depicts a woman with long, flowing hair releasing a group of turtles from a basket. The caption accompanying the piece describes that the woman is “renewing the seasons and continuing the waters of life.” The piece holds a deep meaning and reverence for water which can be found in the Anishinaabe (Ojibwe) belief that women are the caretakers of water. The turtles depicted in the sculpture are also symbols of water, as well as the many directions life can go (as turtles live in water, walk on land, and breathe air).

Ultimately, this beautiful work of art symbolizes the fundamental importance of water as a source of life and as a resource that must be preserved for future generations. The piece can be found at the Mary Gibbs Mississippi Headwaters Center in Itasca State Park. We thank Katherine Schroeder for sharing these photos as she makes her way across the country!  

            Schroeder Law Offices is pleased to announce that Kelsey Seibel has joined the firm as a new associate attorney in Portland, Oregon. Kelsey received her Juris Doctorate from the University of Denver Sturm College of Law in May 2021. She was admitted to the Oregon State Bar on February 24, 2022.

            Kelsey Seibel gained experience in water law through working on the University of Denver Water Law Review during law school, of which she served on the editorial board for two years as an Articles Editor. Kelsey also received a Bachelor of Arts in Economics and Environmental Studies from the University of Wisconsin – Madison. While studying for her Bachelor’s, Kelsey’s area of focus included environmental policy and history surrounding global environmental issues.

            Kelsey’s previous professional experience includes clerking for Judge Christine C. Antoun in the Colorado Judicial Branch Second Judicial District in Denver, Colorado. During her time, she was awarded “2022 Outstanding Courtroom Employee.”

            Kelsey grew up in Milwaukee, Wisconsin along Lake Michigan. When asked about her interest in water law, Kelsey says, “I always knew I wanted to work with natural resources and in the environmental law area. When I decided to go to the University of Denver for law school, I chose to write on the Water Law Review to learn more about water law and water rights in the west. I enjoy the area of water law because it combines my interests in efficient use of natural resources with sustainable growth and allocation of resources.”

            For fun, Kelsey enjoys outdoor activities like camping, running, and biking, as well as baking, cooking, and watching Wisconsin football.

            Kelsey could not be more excited to join Schroeder Law Offices and is determined to work as a passionate advocate to assist in all client needs.

April 22^nd, 2023, is the 53^rd annual Earth Day celebration. The theme of this year’s holiday is “Invest in Our Planet.” The preservation and efficient use of water, a vital natural resource, leads all that we do at Schroeder Law Offices. As a water law office, Schroeder assists municipal water users and districts, individual and family farms, and ranches to promote sustainable water use throughout Oregon, Nevada, Idaho, and Washington. To celebrate, let’s brush up on some Earth Day history.

The beginnings of Earth Day can be traced back to an oil spill off the coast of Santa Barbara in 1969. Because of its devastating effect on the surrounding nature and wildlife, the public’s concern over what could be done to protect the environment grew. After the spill, Wisconsin senator Gaylord Nelson inspired a nationwide “teach-in” day. Senator Nelson enlisted the help of a young activist Denis Hayes, fellow senator Pete McCloskey, and numerous volunteers and activists thereby creating the first Earth Day on April 22^nd, 1970. 20 million people celebrated the first holiday, prompting nationwide demonstrations, protests, and teach-ins.

Earth Day is now a global event celebrated each year through demonstrations, events, and acts of service!

To keep the mission of Earth Day in mind this year, Earthday.org created a list of the many ways you can take care of the earth in your day-to-day life. Some ideas you might try:

• Attending a tree planting event
• Participating in a community beach cleanup
• Planting a pollinator garden to help the population of bees, butterflies, and other organisms in your local ecosystem
• Attending an Earth Day event (find one in your area using this interactive map)
• Reading more on Earth Day history to explore the origins of the holiday

This weekend, please join us in celebrating Earth Day’s mission.

To stay up to date on all things water, be sure to subscribe to our weekly e-newsletter to the right.

What brought you to Schroeder Law Offices?

I came to Schroeder Law Offices right after graduating law school.  During my last year of school I was looking for a post-grad job related to natural resource law.  Having interned in jobs lobbying, in-house counsel for nonprofits, at an Attorney General’s Office, and at a large law firm, I knew I wanted to work in private practice, but in a boutique setting.

During my last semester of law school, I was working with The Freshwater Trust, a nonprofit in Portland, Oregon that does river restoration work. In that internship I had some exposure to water law and found it fascinating.  Schroeder was looking for an associate in Reno at the time. I was looking for a job in a location that would allow more of a rural lifestyle, so it was a perfect fit. I also loved that all the partners were women as this field is so often dominated by men.

What is your go-to productivity trick?

I am very to-do list oriented.  I tend to have one master list with all my projects and then one to two tiers of lists with more immediate tasks that need to be done in the next day or week.  A lot of my motivation comes from crossing something off a list.

What is something you find fascinating about water law?

Water law is one of the few niche practice areas that is incredibly diverse.  Unlike family or criminal law, where the issues, rules, and case law are often recycled, water law issues are always different.  In the last few years I have worked on property law, contract law, tort law, secured transaction law, tribal law, as well as federal issues like the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and historic rights-of-way across federal land. I’ve never enjoyed monotony in a job. At Schroeder, I’m certainly never bored and almost always challenged in a new way!

What do you like to do for fun on the weekends?

Outside of work I like to cook, read, and work in my garden or on my farm. I also like to get outside for an adventure with my hodge-podge pack of dogs. On longer breaks, I like to backpack or kayak with my husband, travel internationally to see new places, learn about history, and try new foods.

What is your favorite book or movie?

I don’t have an all-time favorite book or movie that comes to mind.  Lately, I’ve really enjoyed anything written by Kate Quinn.  I love her portrayals of women’s forgotten roles in history, especially during WWII. 

What’s it like to work at Schroeder Law Offices?

Working at Schroeder is working with a close-knit team. We help each other out and really care about one another as people.  I’ve always felt supported and heard. The leadership has always been invested in my growth as a professional and outside of work. They also encourage me to build and maintain a life outside of the office.

Caitlin Skulan is an associate attorney at Schroeder Law Offices, PC.

At the end of 2021, the Nevada Division of Water Resources (NDWR) completed a public survey to update the 1999 State Water Plan. The previous plan made general water data and information available to the public and addressed water policy issues and recommended actions for a sustainable water future. A lot has changed since 1999, and to address those changes, in 2022 NDWR released the results of the 2021 survey.

1,192 people in total participated, including a wide range of agricultural producers, business owners, tribal members, and more. Respondents were also from both urban and rural areas, with 39% of respondents living in rural or semi-rural areas of Nevada.

The biggest consensus in response to the survey was that of water sustainability. A striking 77% of respondents agreed that the sustainable use of water is extremely important. 79% shared that they now think about water issues more than they did in the past.

Among the biggest concerns were long-term water planning, wasteful or inefficient water use, and the need for conserving water for the future. In rural areas, water availability for agriculture and the transfer of water from rural basins to supply urban areas were major concerns.

Respondents were also asked to give their thoughts on potential long-term plans going forward. Many called for more public outreach, emphasizing the need for accessible, research-based data. Respondents also urged NDWR to provide more opportunities for stakeholder engagement. 

NDWR plans to use these findings to develop a water plan that addresses respondents’ concerns. The agency will consider the survey results when mapping out the direction of future outreach and education efforts. To read the full overview of survey responses, click here.

Therese Stix has been appointed by its Board of Directors as Vice President of the United States Committee on Irrigation and Drainage.  USCID’s mission is to promote progressive and sustainable irrigation, drainage, and flood control practices in support of food and fiber production and public safety, recognizing that sustainability embodies economic, social, and environmental goals.  Therese was appointed to this position after stepping in to help USCID launch after a hiatus during the non-conference years of COVID and the retirement of the past executive director. 

Therese grew up on a row crop farm in eastern Oregon, is passionate about agricultural customs and culture, and continues to support farming and ranching operations in her law practice.  As Vice President, Therese will continue to take an active role in supporting the USCID’s mission while bringing the organization back online.

In addition, USCID is in the process of on boarding Jane Townsend from Ag Association Management Services to assist in promoting and pursuing USCID’s mission post-COVID. We are excited to have Jane assisting us and are currently planning our next conference to take place in Fort Collins, Colorado April 25-28, 2023.  We hope to see you there!

The Oregon Water Resources Department (“OWRD”) has stopped processing new groundwater applications and begun to severely limit groundwater permit extensions. This policy change places a significant burden on groundwater permittees and will directly impact agriculture in Oregon. Ultimately, OWRD’s policy change will significantly limit agricultural expansion in the state. 

In his article “Oregon Moves to Limit Groundwater Development,” Steve Shropshire cites “Draining Oregon,” the 2016 report published in The Oregonian, as the major catalyst for increased regulation. The Oregonian article covered groundwater issues in Oregon and argued that OWRD was over permitting the use of the state’s groundwater supply. Soon after The Oregonian article, OWRD updated their Integrated Water Resources Strategy to name groundwater as one of the biggest issues concerning Oregon’s water future.

Even though OWRD has not passed a rule, OWRD has ceased processing new groundwater applications and limited its issuance of groundwater permit extensions as a policy matter. OWRD has also limited the issuance of new groundwater rights in the Walla Walla, Harney, and Umatilla basins. These actions will pose a big change for agriculture in Oregon, as acquiring new groundwater rights will be much harder, if not impossible. To participate in the rule making process when that occurs, go to:  Water Resources Department: Proposed Rulemaking : Oregon Administrative Rules : State of Oregon

Stay informed on the latest groundwater issues, current events, and all things water by signing up for Schroeder Law Offices’ weekly email newsletter to the right.

The current moment presents a number of unique challenges for water sustainability, including for farmers. When farmers do not have enough water to meet the population’s need for food and goods, the results can be devastating to certain population groups. In his article There Has Never Been a More Important Time to Protect American Food Production, Dan Keppen writes that farmers are facing this water challenge right now.

Due to years-long extreme drought in the west, farmers have been struggling to make ends meet. This has led to a decrease in local agricultural production in the U.S. Unfortunately, this decline comes at a time when the world has been rocked by extreme climate events and global supply chain issues. These challenges make food more costly to produce and purchase.

What makes the situation so urgent is that the need for food is rising. A 2022 GAP Report found that 40 million people around the world experienced “emergency or catastrophic levels” of food insecurity. To meet the population’s growing needs, agricultural output will have to increase by 1.73 percent each year. Keppen writes that bringing U.S. communities the nutritious, affordable food they need will require an increase in local agricultural production.

To learn more about water use and conservation, check out Dan Keppen’s previous blog “There’s a Crisis on the Colorado River.” The article explores the challenges faced by farmers when their water access is reduced. Though reduced water access may be done in an effort to conserve, the reduction can lead to food shortages and financial insecurity for local communities. With so many interests involved, the situation in the west illustrates that a solution to water issues will have to be complex and innovative.

In the first year back since COVID-19, the Nevada State Bar, Environmental & Natural Resources Section held its Annual Meet & Greet event on November 3, 2022.  A social, after work event, honorees included Adam Sullivan (Nevada State Engineer), Micheline Fairbank (Nevada Deputy Administrator for Nevada Division of Water Resources), David Bobzien (Nevada’s Office of Energy), Jim Lawrence (Acting Director, Nevada Department of Conservation & Natural Resources), and Chad Blanchard (Federal Water Master for the Truckee & Carson Rivers).

Section members attending networked with our Nevada agency leads on a more personal level without the stresses of adversarial positions. During the event, Section leaders asked our honorees fun “icebreaker” questions such as: 1) What is your idea of perfect happiness? 2) With which historical person do you most identify? 3) What is your greatest extravagance? and, 4) Which talent would you most like to have?  Of course, these questions sparked fun answers that provided a glimpse into our leaders as people.  Spending time with these Nevada agency leaders on a personal level ultimately allows us to know and appreciate the work we all pursue. 

Schroeder Law Offices Shareholder Therese Stix, as a Co-Chairperson of the Environmental and Natural Resource Law section, is organizing and assisting the Section put on the annual Meet & Greet event.  This will be the first time meeting since COVID shut downs.  Section members are invited to attend this fun social event. For more information, contact Therese at therese@water-law.com!

On October 3^rd, 2022, the Supreme Court heard the oral argument for the first case of its 2022-2023 term: Sackett v. EPA. The case calls into question the definition of “Waters of the United States” (WOTUS), as it will decide the proper test to determine which wetlands are considered WOTUS, and therefore subject to federal regulation from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers under the Clean Water Act.

The case originated after Michael and Chantel Sackett purchased an Idaho property near Priest Lake in 2004. After the couple began building a home on the property in 2007, the EPA informed the Sacketts that they must stop construction and apply for a permit since their land contained a wetland that was adjacent to protected waters. Since the wetland is separated from Priest Lake by a road, the Sacketts claimed that their land is not subject to the Clean Water Act’s jurisdiction and sued the EPA. What followed is a legal battle that could potentially change which wetlands are considered WOTUS going forward.

The Clean Water Act was passed in 1972 in an effort to protect waters of the United States from pollution. Since then, the extent of protections provided by the Clean Water Act has been extensively questioned and changed. These changes  have been brought about by  Supreme Court rulings, plurality and concurring opinions of Supreme Court justices, and presidential administrations, especially those of Presidents Obama, Trump and Biden. 

The basis of both the Sacketts’ and EPA’s arguments can be found in the two waters tests proposed in the 2006 Supreme Court case Rapanos v. United States. The Sacketts have relied on the plurality opinion written by late Justice Antonin Scalia to support their case, which argued that wetlands should be considered WOTUS if the adjacent channels contained a “permanent” body of water such as a river, lake, or stream. Additionally, Justice Scalia argued that a wetland can only be considered WOTUS if it featured a “continuous surface connection” with a more permanent body of water.

The EPA is relying on retired Justice Anthony Kennedy’s concurring opinion in that same 2006 case. Justice Kennedy argued that wetlands must include a “significant nexus to navigable waters.” According to this definition, a wetland does not necessarily have to be continuously connected to navigable waters in order to be protected. Instead, the wetland must have a significant effect on the “chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the Nation’s waters.”

In response to  Sackett v. EPA, many agricultural groups have shared their experiences of uncertainty and hardship brought on by the shifting definition of WOTUS over the years. The Family Farm Alliance, along with other agricultural groups, including the USA Rice and National Association of Wheat Growers and the National Corn Growers Association, submitted an amicus (“friend of the court”) brief earlier this year to voice its perspective on the matter. The brief highlights the problems farmers and ranchers have faced due to the lack of clarity regarding the Clean Water Act’s jurisdiction, which has created confusion over whether waters on their property are subject to EPA and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regulation.

During the October 3^rd oral argument hearing for Sackett v. EPA, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson questioned the Sacketts’ legal counsel on the  difference between “abutting and neighboring wetlands” if the goal of the Clean Water Act is to protect the nations’ waters “chemical, physical, and biological integrity.” Justice Neil Gorsuch commented on the lack of clarity in the Clean Water Act’s definition of “adjacent,” which Justice Sonia Sotomayor pointed out made some of her colleagues critical of whether the term was “precise enough.” Justice Sotomayor went on to question whether there might be “another test that could be more precise and less open-ended” than the adjacency and significant nexus tests to determine which wetlands are protected. Sackett V. EPA, 21-454 U.S. (2022)  

As of now, Sackett v. EPA is pending adjudication before the Supreme Court. Considering the scope of the case, many expect the upcoming decision to have a significant impact on both environmental interests and the agricultural industry.

To learn more about wetlands and Clean Water Act jurisdiction, check out Schroeder Law Offices’ webinar on Wetlands: Due Diligence for Ditches, Drains and Ponds. 

As of September 13^th, Oregon Water Resources Department Director Tom Byler has officially retired after 27 years working for the state of Oregon. A new OWRD director will be appointed by Oregon’s next governor. To serve for the remainder of her term, governor Kate Brown has appointed acting director Doug Woodcock, who previously worked as the Deputy Director of Water Management.  

During his tenure as the director, Tom Byler dedicated his time to modernizing the department’s programs and services to meet the Oregon community’s ever changing water needs. Byler also worked to increase OWRD’s capabilities to collect and analyze data to manage Oregon’s surface and groundwater resources throughout the state.

In the official press release regarding his retirement, Byler said, “As I look to the future of water resources in Oregon, I anticipate that water issues will continue to become more and more complex and challenging.” Byler added, “I am excited about the Department’s increasing capabilities to help communities address those issues.” Though he may be retiring from his current position, Byler intends to carry on his work in water and natural resources issues into his retirement.

The Oregon Water Resources Department is the state agency responsible for ensuring adequate and sustainable water supply to meet present and future needs. To learn more about OWRD, visit their website here: https://www.oregon.gov/owrd/. 

In the article “Trends in Clinical Legal Education Affecting Agriculture” by Caroline Lobdell and Scott Horngren, the authors provide a thorough look into the current state of environmental, agricultural, and animal law programs in law schools throughout the country. Though environmental law programs have steadily increased since the passage of groundbreaking environmental laws in the 1970s, the authors argue that these programs fail to offer a balanced education on agriculture and environmental law. Instead, they often focus exclusively on fighting for environmental causes. In doing so, they neglect to cover the interests of farmers, ranchers, and other natural resource users, who make up a huge part of environmental and agricultural interests.

Rather than viewing natural resource use as inherently wrong or not worthy of study, the article urges law programs to educate students on the interests of natural resource users and the cases they may come across in these industries as lawyers. In doing so, law students will get a more well-rounded understanding of environmental and agricultural issues, be better equipped to anticipate opposing arguments, and even work together with natural resource users in pursuing conservation efforts.  

To showcase the positive impact of a well-balanced environmental and agricultural education, the article uses Lewis & Clark’s Western Resource Legal Center (WRLC) as a case study. The law clinic, incorporated by Laura A. Schroeder, aimed to help students understand the interests of ranching, farming, timber, and other resource dependent industries. WRLC was later incorporated into Lewis & Clark to follow a seminar format to address legal issues affecting these industries in addition to an externship program that has partnered with the Oregon Farm Bureau, the Oregon Cattleman’s Association, American Forest Resource Council, Schroeder Law Offices, and others. With so many students willing to share positive experiences, the article makes a compelling argument for law schools to implement similar programs in their environmental law curriculums.  

WRLC’s founder and former Dean of Lewis and Clark Law School, James Huffman described the program as “a little boat that is finally afloat.”  On WRLC’s inception, Huffman stated “[t]here is a lot more to be done to make it seaworthy and expand the fleet, but it can be done.”  As budding law students with agricultural backgrounds, WRLC alumni, such as Schroeder Law Offices’ Associate Attorney Caitlin Skulan, were able to obtain a more balanced legal education as it pertains to the natural world and the resources we rely on. WRLC was a life raft in a sea full of environmental advocacy opinions on the Lewis and Clark campus.  The balance of working with farmers, ranchers, timber harvesters, and other sustainable natural resources users offers law students a reprieve from viewpoints that organizations like Farm Bureau and Cattlemen’s Associations are the villains of the environmental story. 

Similar to environmental advocacy focused clinics, students are still exposed to a whole host of environmental laws including the Endangered Species Act, the National Environmental Policy Act, the Clean Water Act, and state and federal Administrative Procedure Acts.  WRLC students have an opportunity to participate in real cases with the people who work and rely on natural resources and take pride in their roles as stewards of the land their livelihoods rely on.  As an employer of WRLC Alumni, Schroeder Law Offices hopes to see similar programs emerging at other law schools to better prepare future lawyers to represent our valued clientele.   

To learn more about WRLC and the current state of environmental, agricultural, and animal law programs, check out the link to the full article here.

As fall rains shower Northern Nevada and the first snow fall for Lake Tahoe is on the books for September 19, 2022, it is easy to forget that Nevada remains in a long-standing drought. However, it is important that Nevada continue to take measures to prepare and stay informed about these long-term conditions, even as they begin to improve.

How can Nevadans be best prepared to live with drought?  A number of state and federal resources are available to all Nevadans to track, understand, and adapt to long term drought conditions. These resources include:

State Drought Reports:  The State Climate Office and University of Nevada Reno publishes a monthly 2-3 page drought report with updated drought conditions and projects.  The most recent report can be found here.

US Drought Monitor: Similarly, the US Drought Monitor updates current drought conditions for all states weekly.  The monitor page for Nevada can be found here.

Nevada Drought Planning Workshops: Online and tabletop workshops are held periodically and are announced on the National Integrated Drought Information System, published by the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).  The Nevada page is available here, including links to further information about upcoming drought webinars and workshops.

United States Dept. of Agriculture Mapping:  USDA offers a number of drought mapping tools to track and project drought.  These include the USDA Snotel Mapping system, which maps snowpack, an important seasonal contributor to water recharge in the arid west and the Streamflow Forecast Map, which predicts seasonal streamflow and various points of diversion to allow users to estimate if streamflow will be high enough to meet minimum flow requirements and any senior in-stream water rights that may preclude junior surface water diversion.

These are just some of the many tools available to stay informed about drought.  Want to learn more about drought and drought tools?  Check out our on-demand Western State drought tools webinar here.

            Schroeder Law Offices had a blast working at the 2022 Oregon State Fair. If you weren’t able to make it down to Salem for the annual festivities, we’re here to fill you in. During the fair’s kickoff weekend, Tara Lomacz and Madeleine Criglow worked the Oregon Women for Agriculture booth in Salem Fairgrounds’ Columbia Hall. This space was dedicated to showcasing agriculture in Oregon along with the beautiful works of local authors, photographers, and textile artists. At the Oregon Women for Agriculture booth, Tara and Madeleine had a great time speaking with fairgoers on agriculture and water issues in Oregon.

            To encourage fairgoers to stop by the booth, guests were challenged to spin the trivia wheel for questions on agriculture and farming in Oregon. The questions tested guests’ knowledge on everything from Oregon’s state beverage (milk, if you’re wondering) to how many gallons of water a cow drinks in a day (a whopping 20-30 gallons!). Guests were delighted to realize that they already knew a thing or two about Oregon agriculture (and were pretty happy about the prizes, too).

The Oregon Women for Agriculture booth also featured a map highlighting the water issues currently affecting agriculture and local farmers throughout Oregon. As fairgoers read through the map, many shared their own experiences with water issues and asked about what might be done to protect the natural resource in Oregon. It was rewarding to see guests take such an interest in local agriculture, and Schroeder Law Offices was happy to spread the word on its importance to the environment and economy.

            As the trivia games and discussions came to a close, the fair was just getting started. There was still tons of fun to be had, from checking out live music to indulging in every snack you could imagine. Leaving the fair with an ice cream cone in hand, we were grateful for the opportunity to join in on the fun!

Schroeder Law Offices will be working the Women for Agriculture booth at the Oregon State Fair on Friday, August 26th from 1:00 PM to 3:30 PM and Sunday, August 28th from 3:30 PM to 6:00 PM.

Echo Zhang is a summer law clerk at Schroeder Law Offices. As a new addition to the office, she is eager to learn everything about water law and gain the necessary skills as a practicing attorney. A few questions we asked Echo:

What brought you to Schroeder Law Offices, and what’s your experience?

I’m currently a rising 3L student at the University of Washington. Before joining Schroeder Law Offices, I had law clerk experiences at Chinese law firms specializing in commercial dispute resolution. On the other hand, I developed an interest in general environmental law and water law. Pursuing my interests, I joined the Washington Journal of Social & Environmental Justice and now serve as the Executive Managing Editor.

I first learned of Schroeder Law Offices when I browsed through its website. I was fascinated by the passion for water law shown there. I went through the educational water rights videos on the website and decided that I wanted to learn more about water law. After coming to work here, I found that everyone is excellent, and I’m eager to learn more from everyone!

What is your go-to productivity trick?

Caffeine in the morning, and music at night.

Favorite recipe?

I love cooking slow-cooked recipes, especially braised beef brisket with tomatoes.

Are you an early bird or a night owl?

Night owl. Although fresh air in the morning is great, I love the feeling of freedom at night!

Where can I find you on the weekend?

At home cooking or going to Gas Works Park with my friends to get some fresh air and admire the Seattle skyline.

Coffee or tea?

Both!

Describe your job in three words:

Fun, challenging, and supportive.

What is working at Schroeder Law Office like?

Everyone is supportive and willing to teach me new things. I’m happy to explore water law with my colleagues.

How can you remove easements and other adverse interests from real property?  Suppose you are buying, selling, or developing real property. A lot about the property can be revealed through due diligence, the preliminary title report, or the deed. Sometimes – hopefully not often– this work can surprise property interests and impact a successful conveyance.

In this webinar attorneys Sarah Liljefelt, Nicole Vetter, and Laura Schroeder will share legal strategies to investigate and discover adverse property interests. They will look at title reports and on ground inspection and other sources. Such interests might include

• well sharing agreements,
• ditch easements,
• pipeline or water infrastructure or utility easements.
• or road easements.

Removing or amending these adverse property interests could be critical depending on your transaction goals.

You must register in advance for the webinar by following this link: https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/7816340806642/WN_e2G4lGikT0Sss2sTz11tDw

This webinar will be the 6th in our 2021 series of webinars we have called the “Vaccine” Series. This series is in respect to the on going fight against COVID.  Replays or the past webinars can be viewed at our Water Rights Video Handbook or Guide.

The last webinar of the series will be next month on November 9. It will ask “Should You or Can You Take Storm Water into Your Existing System?”

In the 2021 Nevada legislative session the Assembly considers nine water related bills and the State considers 15 water related bills total.  The 2021 legislative session began on February 1, 2021 and will conclude on June 1, 2021.  The Assembly bills are in various stages of consideration as the session approaches its conclusion. However, the clock has already run for certain bills.  Under Joint Standing Rule 14.3.1 the final standing committee to which a bill or joint resolution is referred in its house of origin may only take action on the bill or joint resolution on or before the 68^th calendar day of the legislative session. Under Joint Standing Rule 14.6, certain exemptions apply for re-referral of a bill to the Senate Committee on Finance or the Assembly Committee on Ways and Means.  The 68^th day of the Session was April 9, 2021.

Other deadlines apply pursuant to Joint Standing Rule 14.3. These include:

1. Final action may only be taken by the House of origin on or before the 79^th calendar day of the legislative session (April 20, 2021);
2. Final standing committee to which a bill is referred in the second House may only take action until the 103^rd day of the legislative session (May 14, 2021) unless referred to the Senate Committee on Finance or the Assembly Committee on Ways and Means; and
3. Final action on the bill may only be taken by the second House on or before the 110^th day of the legislative session (May 21, 2021).

As a result, some of the bills are dead in the water and will progress no further.  Summaries of pre-filed Assembly Bills 5, 6, and 16 can be found in our earlier blog post.  The remaining water related Assembly bills are summarized below.

Assembly Bill 146

Assembly Bill 146 proposes various changes to Nevada Revised Statute (“NRS”), chapter 445A regarding water pollution, including:

1. Requiring the State Department of Conservation and Natural Resources to establish a program regulating water pollution resulting from diffuse sources;
2. Establishing requirements for applicants for certain permits relating to water pollution to post a bond or other surety;
3. Revising the requirements for regulations adopted by the State Environmental Commission relating to water pollution, including the notice requirement relating to adoption of these regulations;
4. Revising provision related to the Director of the Department of Conservation and Natural Resources’ control of water pollution, including control of diffuse sources of water pollution;
5. Revising requirements for permits to discharge pollutants or inject fluids through a well; and
6. Requiring consultation and notification to Indian tribes of certain actions related to water pollution.

Assembly Bill 146 has not passed the Assembly Committee of Natural Resources but is exempt from Standing Rule 14.3.1.

Assembly Bill 354

Assembly Bill 354 is the fruition of one of the bill drafts discussed in this earlier blog.  This bill authorizes the creation and sets forth the authority and duties of water banks.  It additionally requires the State Engineer to submit a biennial report to the legislature related to water banks and provides penalties for violations of its provisions.

Further action on Assembly Bill 354 is not allowed, pursuant to Joint Standing Rule 14.3.1.

Assembly Bill 356

Assembly Bill 356 is the fruition of the other bill draft discussed in this earlier blog.  This bill creates and sets forth the requirements for a voluntary water conservation program and creates an account for the Nevada Division of Water Resources to purchase and retire water rights in targeted basins.

Assembly Bill 356 passed the Assembly Committee of Natural Resources and is being considered by the Assembly Committee of Ways and Means.

Assembly Concurrent Resolution 4

Assembly Concurrent Resolution 4 does not directly affect water resources or water quality.  However, it does direct the Legislative Commission to appoint a committee to conduct an interim study on general improvement districts (“GIDs”).  GID’s provide certain services and facilities to residents of the district, often times including water services.  Assembly Concurrent Resolution 4 will create a committee to study GIDs to: (1) improve accountability and effectiveness; (2) identify areas of continuing abuse and potential abuse in the creation, financing, operation, and oversight of GIDs; (3) consider modifying requirements related to GIDs; and (4) recommend possible legislative solutions to any continuing abuses.

Assembly Concurrent Resolution 4 was referred to the Committee on Legislative Operations and Elections.

Assembly Joint Resolution 2

Assembly Joint Resolution 2 recognizes that that health of forests, rangelands, and soils are inextricably linked to the quantity and quality of water.  It further expresses and supports the Federal Government, state agencies, conservation districts, and local governments to work collaboratively with water purveyors, land managers, private land owners, land users, and other stakeholders to identify watersheds that can be improved by better forest, rangeland, and soil health measures and to identify or establish voluntary programs within the limits of the legislative appropriations, and other available money to address the health of forests, rangelands, and soil.

Assembly Joint Resolution 2 passed the Assembly and is currently being considered by the Senate Committee on Natural Resources.

Assembly Joint Resolution 3

Assembly Joint Resolution 3 urgers various actions relating to the protection and conservation of land and water.  In the resolution, the Legislature expresses its support for the goal of protecting 30 percent of the lands and water in Nevada by 2030.  The resolution urges:

1. State and local agencies to honor tribal jurisdictions and the rights of indigenous tribes in efforts to protect land and water;
2. Fair treatments of all races in efforts to protect land and water;
3. Private landowners to participate in voluntary programs to protect wildlife habitat and increase carbon sequestration; and
4. Nevada Congressional Delegation to identify opportunities for federal legislation and regulatory action to expand protection and conservation measures on public land in Nevada.

Assembly Joint Resolution 3 passed the Assembly and is currently before the Senate Committee on Natural Resources.

Interested in more legislative updates?  Keep an eye on our blog for a summary of the 2021 water related Senate bills.

(Image Credit: https://mynews4.com/news/local/explaining-the-mining-gaming-and-sales-tax-proposals-of-the-2021-nevada-legislature; https://www.reviewjournal.com/news/politics-and-government/nevada/district-map-in-nevada-assembly-skews-blue-study-finds/)

Will Nevada establish water conservation programs? The Nevada Division of Water Resources, Office of the State Engineer (“NDWR”) under the direction of Acting State Engineer Adam Sullivan distributed two draft bills to various lobbying entities.  One seeks to establish a water bank system while the other considers the creation of water conservation initiatives.  As of February 17, 2021, neither of the bills were pre-filed with the Nevada Legislature for the 2021 legislative session.  However, the content of the bill drafts is outlined below.

Water Banking Bill

            What its water banking?  Water banking is a system used to manage water supplies throughout the Western United States.  Water right holders can forego water use and “deposit” or transfer water into the water bank, making it available for “withdrawal” or use by another.  Water banks are often managed at the state level and vary from state to state to accommodate specific regional needs.

NDWR’s water banking bill would amend Nevada Revised Statutes, Chapter 533.  The bill would allow for banking and leasing of water rights for irrigation use.  The bill as drafted will give NDWR the authority to approve of two kinds of water banks: statutory water banks and contract water banks.  Both types of water banks manage the deposit and lease of water rights and inform NDWR of banked water uses.  The bill also includes reporting requirements for these water banks.  While the bill recognizes some differences in the requirements of the two bank types, there is concern that the definition of each bank type is unclear in the current draft.

Another critique of the bill is its failure to limit banked water usage to a specific geographic or hydrographic area.  This raises concern that a water bank could be used to transfer water to any location in the state including outside of its respective hydrographic basin.

One of the bill’s highlights is the exemption banked water rights will receive from NDWR’s “beneficial use” requirement.  Under this exemption, irrigators who are not prepared to use their water can avoid forfeiture and receive the benefit of banking unused water rights.  This will allow for temporary use by another until the original owner is ready to place the water to beneficial use.

Water Conservation Bill

A. Conserved Irrigation Water

NDWR’s proposed water conservation program seeks to “encourage and progressively promote” the conservation and efficient use of water.  The bill encourages water conservation upgrades for irrigation.  As proposed, the bill will be retroactive for water conservation projects performed in the 5 years prior to its passage as well as future conservation efforts.

Applicants for this program will submit their water conservation measure proposal describing to the state how they plan to use conserved water.  It is yet unclear if the water’s usage is limited to irrigation of additional lands, or if irrigators can add conserved water to already irrigated lands to increase the water applied in a single location.

Limitations to conservation are considered in the bill.  For example, irrigators within an irrigation district must obtain district approval.  Additionally, of the amount of water conserved, the irrigator may only retain 75% for the proposed new use.  The remaining 25% of conserved water transfers to the state.  The state will then retain all conserved water until a basin exceeds perennial yield by 10%.  At that point, the state may make any additional water available for new appropriation.  State Agencies and political subdivisions may also hold conserved irrigation water rights for instream flow.

B. Retirement of Water Rights

            The water conservation bill also proposes the creation of a state account for the purchase and retirement of water rights.  NDWR would target certain over-appropriated basins in the following order:

(1)       Basins with greater than 200% over-allocation and over-pumping for the past 5 consecutive years;

(2)        Basins with great than 150% over-allocation; and

(3)       Basins with greater than 100% over-allocation.

Under this program, water would be purchased at fair market appraised value.

Conclusion

The content, structure, and language of these bills will likely develop as NDWR receives feedback and moves through the legislative process. It is important to remember that the public has a voice in this process through lobbying groups as well as their legislators. The public can stay on top of bills, once filed with the legislature here.

Interested in more information on water related legislation?  Read our blog on AB 5, AB 6, and AB 15 for the 2021 legislative session and keep an eye out for more legislature updates at www.water-law.com/blog.