Join the US Committee on Irrigation and Drainage (USCID) on April 12th, 2023 at 11:00 AM (Pacific Time) for a webinar on How to Obtain Title Transfer for Federal Water Projects. Frank Dimick, of Dimick Water Resources Engineering, will host the 30-minute presentation and Q+A session via Zoom. Participants will also learn how the United States can gain international recognition on water projects. After, Schroeder Law Offices’ shareholder and USCID Vice President Therese Stix will give an update on USCID and share more details about the upcoming USCID Conference in October 2023. We hope to see you there!

To learn more about USCID’s mission and upcoming conference, visit their website here.

At the end of 2021, the Nevada Division of Water Resources (NDWR) completed a public survey to update the 1999 State Water Plan. The previous plan made general water data and information available to the public and addressed water policy issues and recommended actions for a sustainable water future. A lot has changed since 1999, and to address those changes, in 2022 NDWR released the results of the 2021 survey.

1,192 people in total participated, including a wide range of agricultural producers, business owners, tribal members, and more. Respondents were also from both urban and rural areas, with 39% of respondents living in rural or semi-rural areas of Nevada.

The biggest consensus in response to the survey was that of water sustainability. A striking 77% of respondents agreed that the sustainable use of water is extremely important. 79% shared that they now think about water issues more than they did in the past.

Among the biggest concerns were long-term water planning, wasteful or inefficient water use, and the need for conserving water for the future. In rural areas, water availability for agriculture and the transfer of water from rural basins to supply urban areas were major concerns.

Respondents were also asked to give their thoughts on potential long-term plans going forward. Many called for more public outreach, emphasizing the need for accessible, research-based data. Respondents also urged NDWR to provide more opportunities for stakeholder engagement. 

NDWR plans to use these findings to develop a water plan that addresses respondents’ concerns. The agency will consider the survey results when mapping out the direction of future outreach and education efforts. To read the full overview of survey responses, click here.

Therese Stix has been appointed by its Board of Directors as Vice President of the United States Committee on Irrigation and Drainage.  USCID’s mission is to promote progressive and sustainable irrigation, drainage, and flood control practices in support of food and fiber production and public safety, recognizing that sustainability embodies economic, social, and environmental goals.  Therese was appointed to this position after stepping in to help USCID launch after a hiatus during the non-conference years of COVID and the retirement of the past executive director. 

Therese grew up on a row crop farm in eastern Oregon, is passionate about agricultural customs and culture, and continues to support farming and ranching operations in her law practice.  As Vice President, Therese will continue to take an active role in supporting the USCID’s mission while bringing the organization back online.

In addition, USCID is in the process of on boarding Jane Townsend from Ag Association Management Services to assist in promoting and pursuing USCID’s mission post-COVID. We are excited to have Jane assisting us and are currently planning our next conference to take place in Fort Collins, Colorado April 25-28, 2023.  We hope to see you there!

The Oregon Water Resources Department (“OWRD”) has stopped processing new groundwater applications and begun to severely limit groundwater permit extensions. This policy change places a significant burden on groundwater permittees and will directly impact agriculture in Oregon. Ultimately, OWRD’s policy change will significantly limit agricultural expansion in the state. 

In his article “Oregon Moves to Limit Groundwater Development,” Steve Shropshire cites “Draining Oregon,” the 2016 report published in The Oregonian, as the major catalyst for increased regulation. The Oregonian article covered groundwater issues in Oregon and argued that OWRD was over permitting the use of the state’s groundwater supply. Soon after The Oregonian article, OWRD updated their Integrated Water Resources Strategy to name groundwater as one of the biggest issues concerning Oregon’s water future.

Even though OWRD has not passed a rule, OWRD has ceased processing new groundwater applications and limited its issuance of groundwater permit extensions as a policy matter. OWRD has also limited the issuance of new groundwater rights in the Walla Walla, Harney, and Umatilla basins. These actions will pose a big change for agriculture in Oregon, as acquiring new groundwater rights will be much harder, if not impossible. To participate in the rule making process when that occurs, go to:  Water Resources Department: Proposed Rulemaking : Oregon Administrative Rules : State of Oregon

Stay informed on the latest groundwater issues, current events, and all things water by signing up for Schroeder Law Offices’ weekly email newsletter to the right.

Schroeder Law Offices not only advises on water issues, but we practice what we teach.  Schroeder Law Offices strives to connect with our clients on a personal level and to understand the practical implications and inconveniences client issues have on your lives.  We can do this, because we are people, too!

Schroeder Law Office Attorneys are ranchers, farmers, and rural homeowners.  Attorney Caitlin Skulan recently lived out some of these rural inconveniences when dealing with failed rural home water and sewer infrastructure. 

In her free time, Skulan spends time on a small 5-acre, in her words, “fixer upper” farm purchased with her husband in 2020.  Before and after work, Caitlin gardens, takes care of livestock, fixes fences, repairs and remodels outbuildings, and chases escapee chickens.  Being on a rural lot, Caitlin’s water is provided by a well.  The home is also equipped with a septic system for sewer. 

All was good as far as the water and sewer infrastructure for the first two years.  However, as any experienced rural homeowner knows, the lack of monthly sewer and water bills eventually comes with a price. 

I. Lessons in 1960s Septic Systems 

Imagine, your in-laws are visiting for a week from out of town, your spouse is away for work, you are working full time developing cases for trial, and you receive a call from your house guests that the showers aren’t draining!  You think nothing of it.  The drain is probably clogged with your sister-in-law’s hair.  You’ll take care of it when you get home.  Then the second call comes, the toilets aren’t flushing!  Now you start to worry.

Fast forward two days, three plumber visits, and a houseful of very disgruntled relatives, and you make a band aid fix, receive a quote for a complete septic line replacement, and are internally cursing the inventor of “Orangeburg” piping.

Orangeburg pipe is a bituminized fiber pipe made from layers of ground, compressed, wood pulp, bound by adhesive, and impregnated with coal tar pitch.  Effectively, it’s a cardboard pipe lined with tar. Also known as “no-corrode” pipe, Orangeburg pipe was commonly used for sewer pipes in homes built between 1945 and 1972.  The product owes its origins to World War II when iron and steel commonly used for sewer pipes were critical to the war effort and thus in short supply for building homes. The use of Orangeburg piping continued after the war ended because it was inexpensive.

Even when installed, the pipe was generally expected to last 50 years before deteriorating conditions would cause the systems to falter. As Orangeburg piping is essentially asphalt soaked paper that is in constant contact with water combined with the pressure of the soil above the pipe and subject to penetrating tree roots, it is not surprising pipes collapses and the system fails.  This is what Caitlin experiences in her 1960s home, requiring the pipe to be dug up, removed, and replaced with a new line. 

II. Sediment, Well Casing, and Calcium Deposits

A few weeks after the septic repairs, Caitlin noticed a reduction in water pressure and sediment in the water coming out of her faucets. Luckily, no house guests were present at the time. Initial research indicated this could be an issue with the well and a well company was called.

The well inspection indicated two things.  First, the water tank was flushed, and the well was in working order, but needed a sediment filter to filter tiny flakes of well casing out of the water. This is a cheap and minor fix as far as well repairs go.  Second, the water filtration system for the well needed to be replaced.  Caitlin, having completed the well inspection, sellers’ disclosures, and water quality test at the time she and her husband purchased their home, didn’t even know a water filtration system existed on the property and had, in fact, been advised not only to the contrary, but that given good water quality, one was not necessary. 

A new water sample was taken and a water quality test conducted to ensure the scope of filtration needed for the well.  While the water quality was within the limits of safe drinking water, the calcium levels were high enough to create concerns with the plumbing in the long term.  Calcium deposits in pipes are common in homes with “hard water” or high mineral contents.  Hard water can, and typically does, build up in drains and pipes. When left unresolved, this can cause corrosion or blockages.  While blockages in drainpipes can be easily and inexpensively resolved, the same is not the case for water supply pipes.  As such, the industry recommendation is to install a water softening system to prevent blockages from occurring or increasing.

III. Takeaways

At Schroeder Law Offices we emphasize due diligence before purchasing a property in an effort to “spend a dime to save a dollar.”  In the context of our practice, this usually means researching the validity, ownership, status, and adequacy of water rights that accompany rural properties.  However, completing due diligence research and inspections on rural water related infrastructure is important, too.

For water supply, a well inspection and water quality test by a reputable company is a must when considering purchasing a rural home.  However, lessons learned would recommend the well inspection and water quality test both be taken one step further.  Rather than rely on seller or realtor representation regarding water supply infrastructure, attend the well inspection yourself.  Ask the inspector to explain the system and its maintenance and upkeep. If necessary, schedule regular inspections to ensure everything is in working order. 

When water quality tests come back, even if safe for human consumption, ask the well inspector or a plumber if there are any concerns from an infrastructure perspective. If the water is hard, will it cause build up and is there any sign of mineral build up at the time of the inspection?  If a water filtration system must be installed, consider it in your purchase price or asking that one be installed by the seller prior to closing.

For septic systems, if the home was built between 1940 and 1990, strongly consider an inspection of the piping.  As Caitlin learned the hard way, having a septic inspection and service does not include an inspection of the pipeline from the home to the septic system.  Consider paying for a plumber knowledgeable in Orangeburg pipeline to camera and inspect the lines from the home to the septic system.  If the pipe is Orangeburg, factor replacing it into your purchase price or consider requesting the pipe be replaced by the seller as a latent defect in the property. 

The current moment presents a number of unique challenges for water sustainability, including for farmers. When farmers do not have enough water to meet the population’s need for food and goods, the results can be devastating to certain population groups. In his article There Has Never Been a More Important Time to Protect American Food Production, Dan Keppen writes that farmers are facing this water challenge right now.

Due to years-long extreme drought in the west, farmers have been struggling to make ends meet. This has led to a decrease in local agricultural production in the U.S. Unfortunately, this decline comes at a time when the world has been rocked by extreme climate events and global supply chain issues. These challenges make food more costly to produce and purchase.

What makes the situation so urgent is that the need for food is rising. A 2022 GAP Report found that 40 million people around the world experienced “emergency or catastrophic levels” of food insecurity. To meet the population’s growing needs, agricultural output will have to increase by 1.73 percent each year. Keppen writes that bringing U.S. communities the nutritious, affordable food they need will require an increase in local agricultural production.

To learn more about water use and conservation, check out Dan Keppen’s previous blog “There’s a Crisis on the Colorado River.” The article explores the challenges faced by farmers when their water access is reduced. Though reduced water access may be done in an effort to conserve, the reduction can lead to food shortages and financial insecurity for local communities. With so many interests involved, the situation in the west illustrates that a solution to water issues will have to be complex and innovative.

In the first year back since COVID-19, the Nevada State Bar, Environmental & Natural Resources Section held its Annual Meet & Greet event on November 3, 2022.  A social, after work event, honorees included Adam Sullivan (Nevada State Engineer), Micheline Fairbank (Nevada Deputy Administrator for Nevada Division of Water Resources), David Bobzien (Nevada’s Office of Energy), Jim Lawrence (Acting Director, Nevada Department of Conservation & Natural Resources), and Chad Blanchard (Federal Water Master for the Truckee & Carson Rivers).

Section members attending networked with our Nevada agency leads on a more personal level without the stresses of adversarial positions. During the event, Section leaders asked our honorees fun “icebreaker” questions such as: 1) What is your idea of perfect happiness? 2) With which historical person do you most identify? 3) What is your greatest extravagance? and, 4) Which talent would you most like to have?  Of course, these questions sparked fun answers that provided a glimpse into our leaders as people.  Spending time with these Nevada agency leaders on a personal level ultimately allows us to know and appreciate the work we all pursue. 

On October 3^rd, 2022, the Supreme Court heard the oral argument for the first case of its 2022-2023 term: Sackett v. EPA. The case calls into question the definition of “Waters of the United States” (WOTUS), as it will decide the proper test to determine which wetlands are considered WOTUS, and therefore subject to federal regulation from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers under the Clean Water Act.

The case originated after Michael and Chantel Sackett purchased an Idaho property near Priest Lake in 2004. After the couple began building a home on the property in 2007, the EPA informed the Sacketts that they must stop construction and apply for a permit since their land contained a wetland that was adjacent to protected waters. Since the wetland is separated from Priest Lake by a road, the Sacketts claimed that their land is not subject to the Clean Water Act’s jurisdiction and sued the EPA. What followed is a legal battle that could potentially change which wetlands are considered WOTUS going forward.

The Clean Water Act was passed in 1972 in an effort to protect waters of the United States from pollution. Since then, the extent of protections provided by the Clean Water Act has been extensively questioned and changed. These changes  have been brought about by  Supreme Court rulings, plurality and concurring opinions of Supreme Court justices, and presidential administrations, especially those of Presidents Obama, Trump and Biden. 

The basis of both the Sacketts’ and EPA’s arguments can be found in the two waters tests proposed in the 2006 Supreme Court case Rapanos v. United States. The Sacketts have relied on the plurality opinion written by late Justice Antonin Scalia to support their case, which argued that wetlands should be considered WOTUS if the adjacent channels contained a “permanent” body of water such as a river, lake, or stream. Additionally, Justice Scalia argued that a wetland can only be considered WOTUS if it featured a “continuous surface connection” with a more permanent body of water.

The EPA is relying on retired Justice Anthony Kennedy’s concurring opinion in that same 2006 case. Justice Kennedy argued that wetlands must include a “significant nexus to navigable waters.” According to this definition, a wetland does not necessarily have to be continuously connected to navigable waters in order to be protected. Instead, the wetland must have a significant effect on the “chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the Nation’s waters.”

In response to  Sackett v. EPA, many agricultural groups have shared their experiences of uncertainty and hardship brought on by the shifting definition of WOTUS over the years. The Family Farm Alliance, along with other agricultural groups, including the USA Rice and National Association of Wheat Growers and the National Corn Growers Association, submitted an amicus (“friend of the court”) brief earlier this year to voice its perspective on the matter. The brief highlights the problems farmers and ranchers have faced due to the lack of clarity regarding the Clean Water Act’s jurisdiction, which has created confusion over whether waters on their property are subject to EPA and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regulation.

During the October 3^rd oral argument hearing for Sackett v. EPA, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson questioned the Sacketts’ legal counsel on the  difference between “abutting and neighboring wetlands” if the goal of the Clean Water Act is to protect the nations’ waters “chemical, physical, and biological integrity.” Justice Neil Gorsuch commented on the lack of clarity in the Clean Water Act’s definition of “adjacent,” which Justice Sonia Sotomayor pointed out made some of her colleagues critical of whether the term was “precise enough.” Justice Sotomayor went on to question whether there might be “another test that could be more precise and less open-ended” than the adjacency and significant nexus tests to determine which wetlands are protected. Sackett V. EPA, 21-454 U.S. (2022)  

As of now, Sackett v. EPA is pending adjudication before the Supreme Court. Considering the scope of the case, many expect the upcoming decision to have a significant impact on both environmental interests and the agricultural industry.

To learn more about wetlands and Clean Water Act jurisdiction, check out Schroeder Law Offices’ webinar on Wetlands: Due Diligence for Ditches, Drains and Ponds. 

            In our earlier blog, Schroeder Law Offices announced the Nevada Division of Environmental Protections’ (NDEP) workshop on Legislative Counsel Bureau (LCB) Draft R113-22.  LCB R113-22 proposed changes to Nevada’s water quality regulations for Nevada surface waters. 

            Now NDEP proposes to adopt additional regulations under the following LCB Numbers:  R114-22, R115-22, and R116-22 amending Chapter 445A of the Nevada Administrative Code for Standards for Water Quality.  More on the proposed regulations is available here.  Changes include setting site-specific selenium criteria for the Las Vegas Wash, adopting the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) drinking water standards for certain contaminants, and assigning beneficial uses and criteria better suited for flood-conveyance channels in Las Vegas.  

            NDEP announced a workshop for these new proposed regulations on October 19, 2022 from 1:00 PM to 3:00 PM.  The workshop will occur online and can be joined by this link or by calling in:

Phone Number: 1-775-321-611
Conference ID: 253-622-142#

            Public comment will be accepted during the workshop and written comments will be accepted until October 24, 2022.  Written comments can be submitted to:

Dave Simpson: dsimpson@ndep.nv.gov

Nevada Division of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Water Quality Planning
901 S. Stewart Street, Suite 4001
Carson City, Nevada 89701

P: (775) 687-9548  F: (775) 687-5856 

Public participation is an important aspect of creating Nevada law.  NDEP regulation changes are governed by the Nevada Administrative Procedure Act.  The agency must solicit and consider public comments in adopting new regulations.  If these issues affect you, Schroeder Law Offices encourages you to participate!

As of September 13^th, Oregon Water Resources Department Director Tom Byler has officially retired after 27 years working for the state of Oregon. A new OWRD director will be appointed by Oregon’s next governor. To serve for the remainder of her term, governor Kate Brown has appointed acting director Doug Woodcock, who previously worked as the Deputy Director of Water Management.  

During his tenure as the director, Tom Byler dedicated his time to modernizing the department’s programs and services to meet the Oregon community’s ever changing water needs. Byler also worked to increase OWRD’s capabilities to collect and analyze data to manage Oregon’s surface and groundwater resources throughout the state.

In the official press release regarding his retirement, Byler said, “As I look to the future of water resources in Oregon, I anticipate that water issues will continue to become more and more complex and challenging.” Byler added, “I am excited about the Department’s increasing capabilities to help communities address those issues.” Though he may be retiring from his current position, Byler intends to carry on his work in water and natural resources issues into his retirement.

The Oregon Water Resources Department is the state agency responsible for ensuring adequate and sustainable water supply to meet present and future needs. To learn more about OWRD, visit their website here: https://www.oregon.gov/owrd/. 

In the article “Trends in Clinical Legal Education Affecting Agriculture” by Caroline Lobdell and Scott Horngren, the authors provide a thorough look into the current state of environmental, agricultural, and animal law programs in law schools throughout the country. Though environmental law programs have steadily increased since the passage of groundbreaking environmental laws in the 1970s, the authors argue that these programs fail to offer a balanced education on agriculture and environmental law. Instead, they often focus exclusively on fighting for environmental causes. In doing so, they neglect to cover the interests of farmers, ranchers, and other natural resource users, who make up a huge part of environmental and agricultural interests.

Rather than viewing natural resource use as inherently wrong or not worthy of study, the article urges law programs to educate students on the interests of natural resource users and the cases they may come across in these industries as lawyers. In doing so, law students will get a more well-rounded understanding of environmental and agricultural issues, be better equipped to anticipate opposing arguments, and even work together with natural resource users in pursuing conservation efforts.  

To showcase the positive impact of a well-balanced environmental and agricultural education, the article uses Lewis & Clark’s Western Resource Legal Center (WRLC) as a case study. The law clinic, incorporated by Laura A. Schroeder, aimed to help students understand the interests of ranching, farming, timber, and other resource dependent industries. WRLC was later incorporated into Lewis & Clark to follow a seminar format to address legal issues affecting these industries in addition to an externship program that has partnered with the Oregon Farm Bureau, the Oregon Cattleman’s Association, American Forest Resource Council, Schroeder Law Offices, and others. With so many students willing to share positive experiences, the article makes a compelling argument for law schools to implement similar programs in their environmental law curriculums.  

WRLC’s founder and former Dean of Lewis and Clark Law School, James Huffman described the program as “a little boat that is finally afloat.”  On WRLC’s inception, Huffman stated “[t]here is a lot more to be done to make it seaworthy and expand the fleet, but it can be done.”  As budding law students with agricultural backgrounds, WRLC alumni, such as Schroeder Law Offices’ Associate Attorney Caitlin Skulan, were able to obtain a more balanced legal education as it pertains to the natural world and the resources we rely on. WRLC was a life raft in a sea full of environmental advocacy opinions on the Lewis and Clark campus.  The balance of working with farmers, ranchers, timber harvesters, and other sustainable natural resources users offers law students a reprieve from viewpoints that organizations like Farm Bureau and Cattlemen’s Associations are the villains of the environmental story. 

Similar to environmental advocacy focused clinics, students are still exposed to a whole host of environmental laws including the Endangered Species Act, the National Environmental Policy Act, the Clean Water Act, and state and federal Administrative Procedure Acts.  WRLC students have an opportunity to participate in real cases with the people who work and rely on natural resources and take pride in their roles as stewards of the land their livelihoods rely on.  As an employer of WRLC Alumni, Schroeder Law Offices hopes to see similar programs emerging at other law schools to better prepare future lawyers to represent our valued clientele.   

To learn more about WRLC and the current state of environmental, agricultural, and animal law programs, check out the link to the full article here.

As fall rains shower Northern Nevada and the first snow fall for Lake Tahoe is on the books for September 19, 2022, it is easy to forget that Nevada remains in a long-standing drought. However, it is important that Nevada continue to take measures to prepare and stay informed about these long-term conditions, even as they begin to improve.

How can Nevadans be best prepared to live with drought?  A number of state and federal resources are available to all Nevadans to track, understand, and adapt to long term drought conditions. These resources include:

State Drought Reports:  The State Climate Office and University of Nevada Reno publishes a monthly 2-3 page drought report with updated drought conditions and projects.  The most recent report can be found here.

US Drought Monitor: Similarly, the US Drought Monitor updates current drought conditions for all states weekly.  The monitor page for Nevada can be found here.

Nevada Drought Planning Workshops: Online and tabletop workshops are held periodically and are announced on the National Integrated Drought Information System, published by the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).  The Nevada page is available here, including links to further information about upcoming drought webinars and workshops.

United States Dept. of Agriculture Mapping:  USDA offers a number of drought mapping tools to track and project drought.  These include the USDA Snotel Mapping system, which maps snowpack, an important seasonal contributor to water recharge in the arid west and the Streamflow Forecast Map, which predicts seasonal streamflow and various points of diversion to allow users to estimate if streamflow will be high enough to meet minimum flow requirements and any senior in-stream water rights that may preclude junior surface water diversion.

These are just some of the many tools available to stay informed about drought.  Want to learn more about drought and drought tools?  Check out our on-demand Western State drought tools webinar here.

            Schroeder Law Offices had a blast working at the 2022 Oregon State Fair. If you weren’t able to make it down to Salem for the annual festivities, we’re here to fill you in. During the fair’s kickoff weekend, Tara Lomacz and Madeleine Criglow worked the Oregon Women for Agriculture booth in Salem Fairgrounds’ Columbia Hall. This space was dedicated to showcasing agriculture in Oregon along with the beautiful works of local authors, photographers, and textile artists. At the Oregon Women for Agriculture booth, Tara and Madeleine had a great time speaking with fairgoers on agriculture and water issues in Oregon.

            To encourage fairgoers to stop by the booth, guests were challenged to spin the trivia wheel for questions on agriculture and farming in Oregon. The questions tested guests’ knowledge on everything from Oregon’s state beverage (milk, if you’re wondering) to how many gallons of water a cow drinks in a day (a whopping 20-30 gallons!). Guests were delighted to realize that they already knew a thing or two about Oregon agriculture (and were pretty happy about the prizes, too).

The Oregon Women for Agriculture booth also featured a map highlighting the water issues currently affecting agriculture and local farmers throughout Oregon. As fairgoers read through the map, many shared their own experiences with water issues and asked about what might be done to protect the natural resource in Oregon. It was rewarding to see guests take such an interest in local agriculture, and Schroeder Law Offices was happy to spread the word on its importance to the environment and economy.

            As the trivia games and discussions came to a close, the fair was just getting started. There was still tons of fun to be had, from checking out live music to indulging in every snack you could imagine. Leaving the fair with an ice cream cone in hand, we were grateful for the opportunity to join in on the fun!

The Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP) is proposing new regulations on water quality.  NDEP announced an official regulation workshop on August 31, 2022 to solicit public comment and input on Legislative Counsel Bureau (LCB) Draft of Proposed Regulation R113-22.

R113-22 sets forth a process for the State Environmental Commission to classify a surface water of the State or a segment thereof as a water of extraordinary ecological, aesthetic, or recreational value.  The Commission then establishes provisions for antidegradation protections to these specially classified surface waters. The draft regulations can be viewed here.

The Workshop will be August 31, 2022 at 10:00 AM to 1:00 PM Pacific Standard Time. More information and the agenda can be viewed on NDEP’s Workshop Notice.

Due to technical difficulties related to the workshop online registration form, attendees may join by:

1. Going to the following link: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-teams/join-a-meeting?rtc=1
2. Entering the Meeting ID:  216 866 144 018
3. Entering the Passcode:  nqZR8P

NDEP will also attempt to accommodate anyone wishing to participate in person at:

Bryan Building
901 South Steward Street
Humboldt Conference Room, 3^rd Floor
Carson City, NV

Interested in more water quality activities?  Check out our blog on NDEP’s last Integrated Water Quality Report for 2020-2022 and stay tuned for the next Integrated Water Quality Report Comment Period in 2023. 

This year’s Oregon State Fair boasts some truly spectacular sights, including agriculture competitions, musical guests, and plenty of opportunities to learn about Oregon farmers and ranchers. If you’re looking to end your summer on a high note, why not Join Schroeder Law Offices at the Oregon State Fair? Friday marks the start of the 11 day event, which runs from August 26^th to September 5^th at the Salem, Oregon Fairgrounds.

Tara Lomacz will be working the Oregon Women for Agriculture booth on Friday, August 26^th from 1 to 3:30 PM and Sunday, August 28^th from 3:30 PM to 6 PM. Madeleine Criglow will also be working the booth that Sunday afternoon to join in on the fun.

Come celebrate and learn about the achievements of all Oregonians, including Oregon’s farmers and ranchers. While you’re there, check out the exciting special events, thrilling competitions, and tasty food.

Find event details on the Oregon State Fair website by clicking here: https://oregonstatefair.org/. We hope to see you there!

Hopefully you didn’t miss the first annual Nevada Agricultural Fair on July 7 through 10, 2022!  Schroeder Law Offices staff didn’t miss it, but if you did, here is a recap:       

Thursday, July 7:  Youth participants checked in livestock including market and breeder goats, sheep, pigs, cattle, and poultry.  Schroeder Law Offices staff assisted with large animal check in and assigning stalls and ear tags.  Then, SLO helped with poultry check in by performing health checks on show and market chickens.

Thursday Night kicked off the three-day Mayhemalition Derby with lawn mower races. Youth agriculture participants attended the derby events for free and were recruited to throw water balloons at the drivers!

Friday, July 8:  The livestock show began with youth showmanship classes.  Youth are judged on how well they show their livestock and general knowledge of the species.  Youth could also participate in Hippology and Horse Judging competitions on Friday.

After the livestock shows, SLO staff hosted a wine wall at the Mayhemalition Demolition Derby to raise funds for next year’s Youth awards.

Saturday, July 9:  Saturday hosted the busiest show day with market and breeder classes. In market and breeder classes, youth are judged by the quality of the animal they raised for the show. Livestock is judged by its breed standard with awards going to best of breed, best of class, and best of show. SLO staff helped run the poultry show, including market, breeder, and showmanship poultry classes. SLO staff also supported the youth market auction by bidding on market chickens.  We even won a couple pens!

Sunday, July 10:  The 2022 Fair wrapped up on Sunday with the Horse Show.  The Horse Show was open to youth and adults, with participant ages ranging from one-and-a-half years to some individuals enjoying retirement.

The first annual Nevada Agriculture Fair proved to be a busy weekend for SLO staff.  However, we had fun, got to connect with some of our clients, and supported local youth agriculture. Keep an eye out for details on next year’s fair at https://www.nvagfair.com/. We will be!

Laura A. Schroeder is the founding partner of Schroeder Law Offices. Long respected in the water rights arena, Laura has generously shared her valuable experiences and provided some great advice. A few questions we asked Laura:

What motivated you to practice water law and start Schroeder Law Offices?

I used to work on a farm and did work related to irrigation. From that experience, I learned the importance of water. Also, my father was a lawyer and I got Influenced by him and became a lawyer. In my early practice years, I worked in a number of law firms and practiced in different areas of law. I then realized that my passion was in water law, so I started my practice.

What is your go-to productivity trick? How do you stay motivated?

The most important thing is that I really enjoy what I do, and I like the people I work with, so I always get motivated when I work. Also, I have the habit of mediation. Meditation helps me center myself.

What do you consider the most important thing about being a good lawyer?

I find the most important thing is to be proud of your profession. I dislike jokes about lawyers because that is disrespectful.

Where can I find you on the weekend?

I love spending time with my family! Last weekend I helped with cleaning at my son’s place, and the week before that I attended my niece’s wedding. I always consider family the most important thing. When I have free time, I also help with writing family genealogy.

What is one thing you like the most about working at Schroeder Law Office?

I like it because lawyering is an intellectually challenging job. In the legal profession, the challenge you need to face constantly changes, and you need to develop new strategies based on the new challenge. Also, at Schroeder Law Offices, everyone has different perspectives on solving problems. I enjoy discussing and developing new strategies with everyone.

Do you have some advice that you can give to young lawyers and law students who are interested in water law?

Beside law school, it is important to have real-life practice experiences as much as possible, because in the legal profession you need to work with people. When I started to practice, I did clerkship with the government, worked with my father, and worked in private law firms. I learned from that experience that working with different kinds of people and lawyers is essential, because it offers you an opportunity to learn from the people you interact with. If you just focus on just one thing, you will definitely miss out on other things.

Echo Zhang is a summer law clerk at Schroeder Law Offices. As a new addition to the office, she is eager to learn everything about water law and gain the necessary skills as a practicing attorney. A few questions we asked Echo:

What brought you to Schroeder Law Offices, and what’s your experience?

I’m currently a rising 3L student at the University of Washington. Before joining Schroeder Law Offices, I had law clerk experiences at Chinese law firms specializing in commercial dispute resolution. On the other hand, I developed an interest in general environmental law and water law. Pursuing my interests, I joined the Washington Journal of Social & Environmental Justice and now serve as the Executive Managing Editor.

I first learned of Schroeder Law Offices when I browsed through its website. I was fascinated by the passion for water law shown there. I went through the educational water rights videos on the website and decided that I wanted to learn more about water law. After coming to work here, I found that everyone is excellent, and I’m eager to learn more from everyone!

What is your go-to productivity trick?

Caffeine in the morning, and music at night.

Favorite recipe?

I love cooking slow-cooked recipes, especially braised beef brisket with tomatoes.

Are you an early bird or a night owl?

Night owl. Although fresh air in the morning is great, I love the feeling of freedom at night!

Where can I find you on the weekend?

At home cooking or going to Gas Works Park with my friends to get some fresh air and admire the Seattle skyline.

Coffee or tea?

Both!

Describe your job in three words:

Fun, challenging, and supportive.

What is working at Schroeder Law Office like?

Everyone is supportive and willing to teach me new things. I’m happy to explore water law with my colleagues.

Schroeder Law Offices Fundraises for Youth Agriculture

            Schroeder Law Offices continues to support and fundraise for youth agriculture. SLO attorney Caitlin Skulan recently organized and ran a Wine Wall fundraiser for the Nevada Agricultural Fair.  Skulan sits on the volunteer Fair Board which prioritizes a youth livestock show and horse show during the annual fair in Douglas County, Nevada. 

            The Wine Wall fundraiser was hosted at Carson Valley Days on June 11^th and 12^th in Gardnerville, Nevada.  Carson Valley Days is organized by the Carson Valley 20-30 Club, an active partner in the Nevada Agricultural Fair. 

            Skulan, Fair Board President Chelsy Simerson, and the booth’s mascot “Atlas” succeeded in raising funds for the Fair and marketing with various businesses, youth livestock clubs, and potential buyers for the youth livestock auction.  The proceeds for the fundraiser will be used to purchase ribbons and buckles as well as offset other costs associated with the youth livestock show on July 8^th-10^th at the Douglas County Fairgrounds.  More information regarding the Fair can be found at:  https://www.nvagfair.com/. 

            SLO encourages attorneys and staff to get involved in the community. Youth agriculture is important to many of SLO’s clients, who have children involved in these activities. Youth livestock shows, 4-H, Grange, and FFA provide youth with an opportunity to learn about animal husbandry and agricultural business at a young age.  Events like the Nevada Agricultural Fair allow youth to showcase their knowledge and animals. 

            We hope to see you at the Fair!

Schroeder Law Offices Returns to the Nevada Junior Livestock Show!

On May 7, 2022, Schroeder Law Offices attended the Nevada Junior Livestock Show in Reno, Nevada.  The three-day show was at the Reno-Sparks Livestock Event Center. The show is a place for the National FFA Organization, 4-H, youth Grange, and independent youth members to exhibit their livestock projects before the public. They develop skills and practices related to livestock production.  These youth organizations are a popular part of Nevada’s agricultural community. They often are an important family activity for our agricultural clients.

Animals at the show included turkeys, pigs, lambs, goats, and steers.  Livestock were judged for quality and breed standards. Youths also competed in showmanship events. These events judged their skills and knowledge in animal handling and rearing.  The show ended with the annual market auction.  Youth are encouraged to contact local businesses and individuals. Then they can attend the auction and bid on livestock. The Western Nevada Grange invited Schroeder to bid on broad breasted white turkeys raised by the Club’s youth members. 

Winning at the Auction

We loved seeing familiar faces in the crowd and attending the Buyer’s dinner. AND we won the bid for Western Nevada Grange Member Sabella Thompson’s turkey! This was Sabella’s first year showing and selling an auction animal for Grange. Sabella sent Schroeder staff home with homemade cookies and her own artwork as a thank you for being her buyer.  The cookies didn’t last long, but Sabella’s art is proudly displayed in the office.   Schroeder Law Office staff also bid on other livestock to support additional local youth in their livestock rearing endeavors.